Peter Otu & Anor. Vrs Rebecca Adjorkor Adjei [2022] GHADC 292 (15 December 2022)
No exceptional circumstances were demonstrated by the Applicant to warrant a stay of proceedings. The Respondents sued as beneficiaries, not administrators, and their capacity is unaffected by the High Court action. The subject matter would not be irretrievably lost, and the Applicant can be compensated if successful in the High Court.
- Citation
- [2022] GHADC 292
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Peter Otu; Plaintiff/respondent: Eunice Otu; Defendant/applicant: Rebecca Adjorkor Adjei
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Motion for Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application for stay of proceedings refused.
- Legal Topics
- Letters of Administration, Stay of Proceedings, Beneficiary Rights
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Otu
Plaintiff/respondent
Eunice Otu
Plaintiff/respondent
Rebecca Adjorkor Adjei
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Motion for Stay of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings should be stayed pending determination of a suit at the High Court challenging the Letters of Administration.
Ratio Decidendi
No exceptional circumstances were demonstrated by the Applicant to warrant a stay of proceedings. The Respondents sued as beneficiaries, not administrators, and their capacity is unaffected by the High Court action. The subject matter would not be irretrievably lost, and the Applicant can be compensated if successful in the High Court.
Court Disposition
Application for stay of proceedings refused.
Orders
- Costs of GH¢1,500.00 awarded against the Applicant in favour of the Respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment