Registered Trustees of The Socio-economic Rights and Accountability Project (serap) vs Nigeria and Another (ECW/CCJ/APP/09/11; ECW/CCJ/RUL/03/14) [2014] ECOWASCJ 1 (13 February 2014)
The plaintiff NGO lacks locus standi to bring the action on behalf of the alleged victims without being a victim itself or having prior authorization from the victims or their relatives; therefore, the case is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2014] ECOWASCJ 1
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: The Registered Trustees of the Socio-Economic Rights & Accountability Project (SERAP); Defendant/applicant: Federal Republic of Nigeria; Defendant/applicant: Attorney General of the Federation & Minister of Justice
- Court
- ECOWAS Community Court of Justice
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2014
- Case Number
- ECW/CCJ/APP/09/11 ; ECW/CCJ/RUL/03/14
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Objection in Human Rights Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Preliminary objection upheld; case dismissed for lack of locus standi.
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi, Jurisdiction, NGO Standing, Victims' Rights
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Registered Trustees of the Socio-Economic Rights & Accountability Project (SERAP)
Plaintiff/respondent
Federal Republic of Nigeria
Defendant/applicant
Attorney General of the Federation & Minister of Justice
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection in Human Rights Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff NGO has locus standi to bring the action on behalf of alleged victims without authorization
- 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the case in the circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff NGO lacks locus standi to bring the action on behalf of the alleged victims without being a victim itself or having prior authorization from the victims or their relatives; therefore, the case is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Preliminary objection upheld; case dismissed for lack of locus standi.
Orders
- Plaintiff's case is dismissed for lack of locus standi.
- Plaintiff to bear the cost of proceedings in line with Article 66(5) of the Rules of the Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment