Stanley Vrs Gyapong [2022] GHADC 205 (22 August 2022)
The marriage had broken down beyond reconciliation as evidenced by the parties' separation for five years, mutual consent to divorce, and failed reconciliation efforts. The Petitioner is in a better financial position and must pay a lump sum as financial settlement and monthly maintenance for the children, with custody awarded to the Respondent.
- Citation
- [2022] GHADC 205
- Parties
- Petitioner: Donkor Stanley; Respondent: Love Gyapong
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- Marriage dissolved; consequential orders issued.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Alimony, Child Custody, Child Maintenance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Donkor Stanley
Petitioner
Love Gyapong
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the parties had broken down beyond reconciliation
- 2 Whether the Respondent is entitled to alimony of GHC 20,000
- 3 Whether the issues of the marriage should be maintained at GHC 900 per month
Ratio Decidendi
The marriage had broken down beyond reconciliation as evidenced by the parties' separation for five years, mutual consent to divorce, and failed reconciliation efforts. The Petitioner is in a better financial position and must pay a lump sum as financial settlement and monthly maintenance for the children, with custody awarded to the Respondent.
Court Disposition
Marriage dissolved; consequential orders issued.
Orders
- Petitioner to pay Respondent GHC 12,000 as financial settlement.
- Custody of all three children awarded to Respondent with reasonable access to Petitioner.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment