IMORO VRS YAKUBU (A1/14/23) [2024] GHADC 381 (6 February 2024)

IMORO VRS YAKUBU (A1/14/23) [2024] GHADC 381 (6 February 2024)

The defendant encroached onto the plaintiff’s land (plots 81 and 82) as evidenced by the court-appointed surveyor’s report and lack of valid site plan or permit by the defendant; plaintiff proved ownership and entitlement to reliefs sought on the balance of probabilities.

Citation
IMORO VRS YAKUBU (A1/14/23) [2024] GHADC 381 (6 February 2024)
Parties
Plaintiff: Malia Imoro; Defendant: Utaz Mohammed Yakubu
Court
ghadc
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
6 February 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Land Dispute / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff; defendant’s counterclaim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Title to Land, Trespass, Injunctions, Damages, Survey Evidence
Source Language
eng

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Malia Imoro

Plaintiff

Utaz Mohammed Yakubu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Land Dispute / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant has encroached onto plot nos. 81 and 82 Taha Residential Area, Block B, Nanton-Taha
  2. 2 Whether either party is entitled to his or her claim

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant encroached onto the plaintiff’s land (plots 81 and 82) as evidenced by the court-appointed surveyor’s report and lack of valid site plan or permit by the defendant; plaintiff proved ownership and entitlement to reliefs sought on the balance of probabilities.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff; defendant’s counterclaim dismissed.

Orders

  • Declaration that plaintiff is owner of plots 81 and 82 Taha Residential Area, Block B, Nanton-Taha.
  • Defendant to remove structure illegally erected on plaintiff’s plots (area edged dash blue/marked STR in Exhibit CW2) by 27th February, 2024.