Quarcoo and Others Vrs Goga and Another [2023] GHADC 399 (27 March 2023)
The second defendant failed to prove she was a spouse or co-owner of the property, and no evidence was provided of her interest; the plaintiffs, as administrators, are entitled to recover possession and eject the first defendant.
- Citation
- [2023] GHADC 399
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Martin Elliotts Quarcoo and 2 others; Defendant: Randolph Goga; Defendant: 1 other (second defendant)
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Ejectment, Recovery of Possession, Mense Profits, Administration of Estates, Co Ownership, Deed of Trust, Spousal Rights
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Elliotts Quarcoo and 2 others
Plaintiff
Randolph Goga
Defendant
1 other (second defendant)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2nd defendant is a spouse of the deceased Kingsford Quarcoo
- 2 Whether the 2nd defendant co-owns the disputed property
- 3 Whether the deceased created a deed of trust in favour of the plaintiffs gifting the disputed property
Ratio Decidendi
The second defendant failed to prove she was a spouse or co-owner of the property, and no evidence was provided of her interest; the plaintiffs, as administrators, are entitled to recover possession and eject the first defendant.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiffs
Orders
- First defendant to yield vacant possession of Kings Lodge by 30th June 2023
- Plaintiffs to recover possession of the property
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment