Ghana Judgment

Circuit Court

Estate Of John Kwabena Ofosu-afriyie(jofa) [2023] GHACC 471 (10 February 2023)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Withdrawal of a will from court custody does not constitute revocation under Section 9 of Act 360; the will remains valid and the deceased died testate, making the grant of letters of administration improper.

Court disposition

grant of letters of administration rescinded

Orders

  • The 29th August 2022 grant of letters of administration is rescinded.
  • Parties to proceed in accordance with law.
  • No order as to costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

Mavis Oparebea Hoyle

Applicant Counsel: Hope Agboado holding brief for Bright Amu

Theresa Naana Afriyie

Applicant Counsel: Hope Agboado holding brief for Bright Amu

Michael Afriyie

Applicant Counsel: Hope Agboado holding brief for Bright Amu

Jude Ofosu-Afriyie

Caveator Counsel: James Gawuga Nkrumah

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Probate / Ruling on Caveat Against Grant of Letters of Administration

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The late JOFA withdrew his June 2007 will from the Akim Oda High Court, which amounts to legal revocation, so there is no will and letters of administration should be granted.
Respondent
The June 2007 will of the late JOFA has not been legally revoked as required by the Wills Act, 1971 (Act 360), so the grant of letters of administration is improper.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 9, Wills Act, 1971 (Act 360)

    Revocation of a will must comply with Section 9 of the Wills Act, 1971 (Act 360); withdrawal from court custody is not a revocation.

  2. 02

    Section 11, Wills Act, 1971 (Act 360)

    Deposit or withdrawal of a will with the High Court is for safekeeping and does not affect its validity unless revoked per statute.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Withdrawal of a will from court custody does not constitute revocation under Section 9 of Act 360; the will remains valid and the deceased died testate, making the grant of letters of administration improper.

Obiter and limits

  • The court will not address the validity of the will itself as that issue is not before it per this caveat.

Court disposition

grant of letters of administration rescinded

  • The 29th August 2022 grant of letters of administration is rescinded.
  • Parties to proceed in accordance with law.
  • No order as to costs.

Source and reliance status

Circuit Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Circuit Court

Judgment

[2023] GHACC 471

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT ‘2’ ADENTAN SITTING BEFORE HER HONOUR SEDINAM AWO BALOKAH (MS) THE PRESIDING JUDGE ON THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023 TIME: 9:30 AM SUIT NO. C7/024/2022 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN KWABENA OFOSU-AFRIYIE (JOFA)

AND

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF LETTERS OF

ADMINISTRATION BY MAVIS OPAREBEA HOYLE (WIFE), THERESA NAANA AFRIYIE (DAUGHTER), MICHAEL AFRIYIE (CUSTOMARY SUCCESSOR) Parties Applicants present Representation Caveator’s Lawful Attorney present Hope Agboado present holding brief for Bright Amu for Applicants. James Gawuga Nkrumah present for Caveator. By Court – Ruling This is a Summary determination of the substance or essence of the caveat filed by Jude Ofosu-Afriyie acting per his Lawful Attorney, Marcus Owusu-Afriyie. In the said Caveator’s Affidavit of Interest, he claims that a Will of the deceased, John Kwabena Ofosu-Afriyie (Hereinafter referred to as “The late JOFA”) made in June 2007 is still in existence and thus rendered it legally unsound for this Court to have granted Letters of Administration to the Applicants herein. It is the Caveator’s further claim that the said June 2007 Will of the Late JOFA has since its making not been legally revoked as required by the Wills Act, 1971 (Act 360), therefore the Court must set aside the grant of Letters of Administration to the Applicants herein. The Applicants have argued that the late JOFA had by a letter to the Akim Oda High Court Registrar, written to the said Court indicating his intention to withdraw from the Court’s Custody, his June 2007 Will (See ‚Exhibit E‛). This, the Applicants argue, amounts to a legal revocation of the said Will by the Late JOFA. They

therefore submit that, the grant of Letters of Administration to the Applicants proceed as there exists no Will of the Late JOFA. The question to answer is whether or not there exists a Will belonging to the Late JOFA as at the date this Court granted the Application for Letters of Administration subject to publication. The Court will not raise and answer any question as to the validity of any such Will. That issue is not before this Court per this Caveat. From “Exhibit JOFA 5‛ and ‚Exhibit E‛, it is clear that the Late JOFA deposited a WiIl at The Akim Oda High Court on 5th July 2007, the Will being a June 2007 Will. It is further clear that the Late JOFA sought to withdraw the said Will by ‚Exhibit E‛. Does the withdrawal amount to a revocation of the Will thereby nullifying its existence? I think not. Section 9 of Act 360 clearly stipulates the acts that amount to a revocation of a Will. “Exhibit E‛ is definitely not an act that meets the criteria set out in Section 9 of Act 360. Further, Section 11 of Act 360 indicates that the deposit of a Will with a High Court is merely for safe keeping in the custody of the Court, especially as withdrawal of a Will from the custody of a High Court is not mentioned at Section 9 of Act 360 as an act of revocation of the said Will. In the circumstances, it is hereby determined that so long as the June 2007 Will of the Late JOFA is still in

existence and not revoked as per Section 9 of Act 360, the grant of Letters of Administration to the Applicants herein subject to publication, made by this Court on the 29th day of August 2022, is made in violation of law as the Late JOFA per ‚Exhibit JOFA 5‛ died testate and not intestate. The 29th August 2022 grant is therefore rescinded. Parties are advised to proceed in accordance with law. Counsel for Caveator: We waive cost. By Court No award as to cost at same is waived by Counsel for Caveator. (SGD) H/H SEDINAM AWO BALOKAH

CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE Sarafina./* 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Wills Act, 1971 (Act 360)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.