Ghana Judgment

High Court

Adjetey Vrs Imperial Homes Ltd [2023] GHAHC 94 (6 July 2023)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Plaintiff's claim is clear and the Defendant has not set up any bonafide defence or created a situation indicating triable issues; therefore, summary judgment is granted.

Court disposition

Summary judgment granted in favor of Plaintiff

Orders

  • Application for summary judgment in respect of relief (iii) is granted as prayed
  • Cost of GH¢10,000.00 awarded in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant

02

Material facts

Parties

Michael Adjetey

Plaintiff Counsel: Tata Kosi Foliba holding brief of Sean Kwamina Addo Mensah

Imperial Homes Ltd

Defendant Counsel: Ransford Ofori Jnr

Amounts and remedies

  • Costs Awarded: GHS 10,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Summary Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Plaintiff claims entitlement to summary judgment as the Defendant has not raised any bonafide defence or triable issue.
Respondent
No affidavit in opposition was filed by the Defendant.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Civil Procedure Rules

    Summary judgment is granted where the defendant fails to raise a bonafide defence or triable issue.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Plaintiff's claim is clear and the Defendant has not set up any bonafide defence or created a situation indicating triable issues; therefore, summary judgment is granted.

Court disposition

Summary judgment granted in favor of Plaintiff

  • Application for summary judgment in respect of relief (iii) is granted as prayed
  • Cost of GH¢10,000.00 awarded in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant

Source and reliance status

High Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court

Judgment

[2023] GHAHC 94

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AT LAW COURT COMPLEX, ACCRA (GENERAL JURISDICTION 11) HELD IN ACCRA ON THURSDAY THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2023 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP RICHARD APIETU (J) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUIT NO. GJ/0052/2023

MICHAEL ADJETEY -

PLAINTIFF VRS.

IMPERIAL HOMES LTD -

DEFENDANT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY JUDGMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I have perused the affidavit of Pokua Allen-Koufie of Accra the deponent herein, filed on 21st June 2023 in support of Motion on Notice for Summary Judgment. I have heard the submissions of Tata Kosi Foliba Esq., Counsel for and on behalf of the Applicant herein. I have noted that even though on 23rd June 2023 the notice of the Application for Summary Judgment was served on Defendant’s Counsel through his clerk, the Defendant has up to date, 6th July 2023 not filed any Affidavit in Opposition. It is my view that the Plaintiff’s claim is clear and the Defendant has not set up any bonafide defence to the claim neither has the Defendant created a situation indicating that there are triable issues between the Defendant and the Plaintiff. The Application for Summary Judgment in respect of relief (iii) is hereby granted as prayed. Cost of GH¢10,000.00 is awarded in favor of the Plaintiff against the Defendant.

JUSTICE RICHARD APIETU (HIGH COURT JUDGE) (SGD.) COUNSEL:

TATA KOSI FOLIBA HOLDING BRIEF OF SEAN KWAMINA ADDO MENSAH

FOR THE PLAINTIFF

RANSFORD OFORI JNR FOR THE DEFENDANT 2

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.