Badu Vrs Asamoah [2018] GHADC 1 (17 July 2018)

Badu Vrs Asamoah [2018] GHADC 1 (17 July 2018)

The plaintiff failed to prove her root of title to the disputed land and did not establish the identity and boundaries of the land as required by law. The defendant, through consistent and corroborated evidence, proved that the land was acquired by his late father and passed to him and his siblings. The defendant's counter-claim was established on the preponderance of probabilities.

Citation
[2018] GHADC 1
Parties
Plaintiff: Monica Badu; Defendant: Kwasi Asamoah
Court
District Court
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
17 July 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Land Dispute / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's case dismissed; judgment for defendant on counter-claim.
Legal Topics
Declaration of Title, Recovery of Possession, Trespass, Perpetual Injunction, Counter Claim, Burden of Proof
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Monica Badu

Plaintiff

Kwasi Asamoah

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Land Dispute / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff has valid title to the disputed land
  2. 2 Whether the disputed land is the property of the plaintiff
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of possession

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff failed to prove her root of title to the disputed land and did not establish the identity and boundaries of the land as required by law. The defendant, through consistent and corroborated evidence, proved that the land was acquired by his late father and passed to him and his siblings. The defendant's counter-claim was established on the preponderance of probabilities.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's case dismissed; judgment for defendant on counter-claim.

Orders

  • Plaintiff's case dismissed entirely.
  • Declaration that the disputed land is the property of the defendant, who shall take possession.