GEORGETTE ANINWAA OSEI-TETTEH VRS NATHANIEL NII NOI TETTEH [2022] GHACC 306 (15 December 2022)

Both parties have demonstrated by their conduct and evidence that the marriage has broken down beyond reconciliation, and all diligent attempts to resolve their differences have failed. The statutory requirements for dissolution under Act 367 are satisfied.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2022] GHACC 306
Parties: Petitioner: Georgette Animwaa Osei-Tetteh; Respondent: Nathaniel Nii Noi Tetteh
Court: Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Ghana
Judgment Date: 15 December 2022
Procedural Posture: Divorce Petition / Final Judgment
Outcome: petition for divorce granted
Legal Topics: Divorce, Custody, Matrimonial Property, Alimony
Source Language: english

Family Law Divorce Custody Matrimonial Property Alimony

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3

Parties

Georgette Animwaa Osei-Tetteh

Petitioner

Nathaniel Nii Noi Tetteh

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce Petition / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the marriage has broken down beyond reconciliation under the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1971 (Act 367)
2 Entitlement to custody of the children
3 Division of matrimonial property

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

petition for divorce granted

Orders

Decree of dissolution of marriage celebrated on 30th August 2008 at St. Mary the Virgin Anglican Church, Accra
Marriage certificate number ST. MAC 08/08 cancelled; Registrar to notify church administrator

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.