Nyarko v Sarpong (G/WJ/A9/20/2023) [2025] GHADC 189 (16 April 2025)
Plaintiff proved entitlement to repossess the property as defendant was a bare licensee with no proprietary interest and was given reasonable notice. Defendant failed to prove her counterclaim with credible evidence or corroboration, and her evidence was contradictory and unsupported.
- Citation
- [2025] GHADC 189
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Patrick Ofori Nyarko; Defendant: Victoria Akua Sarpong
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2025
- Case Number
- G/WJ/A9/20/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for plaintiff; defendant's counterclaim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Ejectment, Counterclaim, Burden of Proof, Licence to Occupy Property
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Ofori Nyarko
Plaintiff
Victoria Akua Sarpong
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff is entitled to an ejectment order against the defendant
- 2 Whether defendant is entitled to her counterclaim for compensation, payment under terms of settlement, value of abandoned kitchen utensils, and engagement fee for sales
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff proved entitlement to repossess the property as defendant was a bare licensee with no proprietary interest and was given reasonable notice. Defendant failed to prove her counterclaim with credible evidence or corroboration, and her evidence was contradictory and unsupported.
Court Disposition
judgment for plaintiff; defendant's counterclaim dismissed
Orders
- Defendant to vacate the property and yield up vacant possession to plaintiff by 30th June 2025
- Costs of GHC20,000.00 awarded to plaintiff against defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment