Oddoye Vrs Oddoye [2022] GHADC 196 (22 December 2022)
The petitioner proved unreasonable behaviour by the respondent and failed reconciliation attempts, satisfying the statutory grounds for dissolution. The court found the marriage had broken down beyond reconciliation and granted ancillary reliefs based on the parties' circumstances.
- Citation
- [2022] GHADC 196
- Parties
- Petitioner: Harry Vincent Ashong Oddoye; Respondent: Phyllis Oddoye
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Custody, Alimony, Maintenance, Matrimonial Property
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harry Vincent Ashong Oddoye
Petitioner
Phyllis Oddoye
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage has broken down beyond reconciliation under the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1971 (Act 367)
- 2 Whether the petitioner proved unreasonable behaviour by the respondent
- 3 Whether the requirements for failed reconciliation attempts were met
Ratio Decidendi
The petitioner proved unreasonable behaviour by the respondent and failed reconciliation attempts, satisfying the statutory grounds for dissolution. The court found the marriage had broken down beyond reconciliation and granted ancillary reliefs based on the parties' circumstances.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- Custody of the children granted to the respondent with reasonable access to the petitioner (fortnightly weekends and during vacation)
- Petitioner to pay school fees and medical expenses of the children as they fall due
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment