Adjei and Another Vrs Okaikai [2003] GHACA 4 (5 February 2003)
The plaintiffs failed to comply with the mandatory statutory condition precedent under Section 67 of Act 63 by not seeking revocation of probate before commencing action; thus, their action is not maintainable and is a nullity.
- Citation
- [2003] GHACA 4
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Lydia Adjei; Plaintiff/respondent: Moses Oblin Aryeefio; Defendant/appellant: Beatrice Okaikai Welbeck
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 5 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; plaintiffs' action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Probate, Revocation of Grant, Maintainability of Action, Statutory Compliance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lydia Adjei
Plaintiff/respondent
Moses Oblin Aryeefio
Plaintiff/respondent
Beatrice Okaikai Welbeck
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs' action was maintainable in light of an unrevoked probate
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to dismiss the plaintiffs' action for non-compliance with statutory requirements
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs failed to comply with the mandatory statutory condition precedent under Section 67 of Act 63 by not seeking revocation of probate before commencing action; thus, their action is not maintainable and is a nullity.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; plaintiffs' action dismissed
Orders
- Ruling of the High Court dated 25th November 2002 set aside
- Plaintiffs' action dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment