Gaise Zwennes Hughes & Co Vrs Loders Crocklaan B. V. [2012] GHASC 7 (1 February 2012)
Non-compliance with section 30(1) of the Legal Profession Act, 1960 (Act 32) is fatal to an action by a lawyer to recover fees, and the court has no discretion to overlook such breach; the action is invalid and must be dismissed.
- Citation
- [2012] GHASC 7
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Gaise Zwennes Hughes & Co.; Defendant/respondent: Loders Crocklaan B.V.
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 1 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Professional Fees, Statutory Compliance, Retainer Agreements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gaise Zwennes Hughes & Co.
Plaintiff/appellant
Loders Crocklaan B.V.
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether non-compliance with section 30(1) of the Legal Profession Act, 1960 (Act 32) invalidates an action by a lawyer to recover fees
- 2 Whether the defendant waived the requirement for service of a bill of fees before suit
Ratio Decidendi
Non-compliance with section 30(1) of the Legal Profession Act, 1960 (Act 32) is fatal to an action by a lawyer to recover fees, and the court has no discretion to overlook such breach; the action is invalid and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The action commenced before the High Court on 15 November 2006 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment