In the matter of the Estate of Heb (Hess) (Deceased) (PA/0816/2023) [2023] GHAHC 384 (3 November 2023)
There is a substantive dispute as to the caveatrix's capacity as surviving spouse and entitlement to the grant; the application for removal of caveat is refused and the applicants are to issue a writ for determination of entitlement.
- Citation
- [2023] GHAHC 384
- Parties
- Applicant: Rudolf Heb; Applicant: Brigitte Kalbacher-Heb; Caveatrix: Cindy Amahada
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 3 November 2023
- Case Number
- PA/0816/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration / Ruling on Application for Removal of Caveat
- Outcome
- application for removal of caveat dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Letters of Administration, Caveat Proceedings, Capacity of Surviving Spouse
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rudolf Heb
Applicant
Brigitte Kalbacher-Heb
Applicant
Cindy Amahada
Caveatrix
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Ruling on Application for Removal of Caveat
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the caveatrix has a legal interest as surviving spouse to entitle her to letters of administration
- 2 Whether the caveat should be removed to allow grant of letters of administration
Ratio Decidendi
There is a substantive dispute as to the caveatrix's capacity as surviving spouse and entitlement to the grant; the application for removal of caveat is refused and the applicants are to issue a writ for determination of entitlement.
Court Disposition
application for removal of caveat dismissed
Orders
- Applicants to issue a writ for determination of entitlement to grant of letters of administration within 14 days
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment