S v Kumah (B4/01/23) [2023] GHADC 1325 (15 August 2023)
The prosecution's evidence was inconsistent and failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted the complainant; therefore, the accused is acquitted and discharged.
- Citation
- [2023] GHADC 1325
- Parties
- Complainant: The Republic; Accused: Godsway Kumah
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2023
- Case Number
- B4/01/23
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Acquittal and discharge
- Legal Topics
- Assault, Burden of Proof, Evidence, Standard of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Parties
The Republic
Complainant
Godsway Kumah
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused unlawfully assaulted the complainant contrary to Section 84 of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29)
- 2 Whether the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi
The prosecution's evidence was inconsistent and failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted the complainant; therefore, the accused is acquitted and discharged.
Court Disposition
Acquittal and discharge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment