Oppong Vrs Anarfi [2011] GHASC 6 (10 February 2011)
The Supreme Court found that Exhibit A was properly admitted as a receipt and not an instrument transferring land, that the evidence supported the finding of a sale agreement, and that the trial judge erred in admitting extrinsic evidence to contradict the written agreement. The appeal was dismissed as the Court of Appeal's decision was supported by the evidence and legal principles.
- Citation
- [2011] GHASC 6
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Yaw Oppong; Plaintiff/appellant/respondent: Charles Anarfi
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sale of Land, Loan Agreements, Admissibility of Evidence, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yaw Oppong
Defendant/appellant
Charles Anarfi
Plaintiff/appellant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transaction between the parties was a sale of property or a loan secured by property
- 2 Whether Exhibit A was admissible and its legal effect
- 3 Whether the judgment was against the weight of evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court found that Exhibit A was properly admitted as a receipt and not an instrument transferring land, that the evidence supported the finding of a sale agreement, and that the trial judge erred in admitting extrinsic evidence to contradict the written agreement. The appeal was dismissed as the Court of Appeal's decision was supported by the evidence and legal principles.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; Court of Appeal judgment affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment