Linda Danladi Vrs Sam Kwesi Andoh [2023] GHACC 470 (3 February 2023)
- Citation
- [2023] GHACC 470
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Court
- Circuit Court
- Posture
- Petition / Ruling on Motion to Set Aside Petition
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Circuit Court
- Posture
- Petition / Ruling on Motion to Set Aside Petition
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Failure to obtain leave before issuing and serving the petition outside jurisdiction is a fundamental non-compliance affecting the court's jurisdiction, rendering the proceedings a nullity.
Court disposition
Petition and all proceedings set aside as nullity.
Orders
- Suit set aside in its entirety.
- Petitioner may re-apply.
- Cost of Four Thousand Ghana Cedis (GH₵4,000.00) awarded against the petitioner.
02
Material facts
Parties
Dr. Linda Danladi
Petitioner Counsel: Emmanuel Selase AsamoahSam Kwesi Andoh
Respondent Counsel: Francis Kojo Kwarteng ArthurAmounts and remedies
- Costs Awarded: GHS 4,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Petition / Ruling on Motion to Set Aside Petition
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether failure to obtain leave before serving petition outside jurisdiction renders proceedings a nullity
- 02
Whether non-compliance with court order is curable under Order 81 of CI 47
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The petition and notice were served outside Ghana without leave of court, rendering the proceedings a nullity.
- Respondent
- The irregularity is curable under Order 81 of CI 47.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
trite learning
Non-compliance with a condition precedent for originating process goes to the root of the matter and affects jurisdiction.
- 02
Order 81 of CI 47
Order 81 of CI 47 provides for curable irregularities in procedure.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Failure to obtain leave before issuing and serving the petition outside jurisdiction is a fundamental non-compliance affecting the court's jurisdiction, rendering the proceedings a nullity.
Obiter and limits
- The petitioner is at liberty to re-apply after putting her house in order.
Court disposition
Petition and all proceedings set aside as nullity.
- Suit set aside in its entirety.
- Petitioner may re-apply.
- Cost of Four Thousand Ghana Cedis (GH₵4,000.00) awarded against the petitioner.
Source and reliance status
Circuit Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Circuit Court
Judgment
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT ‘2’ ADENTAN BEFORE HER HONOUR
SEDINAM AWO BALOKAH (MS) THE PRESIDING JUDGE ON THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
SUIT NO. TIME: 9:10 AM C5/027/2023 DR. LINDA DANLADI
PETITIONER
ACCRA VRS.
SAM KWESI ANDOH
RESPONDENT BWF SOLICITORS 4TH FLOOR ANNA HOUSE 214-218 HIGH ROAD LONDON N15 4NP Parties Present Emmanuel Selase Asamoah Present for Petitioner/Respondent Francis Kojo Kwarteng Arthur Present for Respondent/Applicant Counsel for Respondent/Applicant: We move in terms of the Motion filed on 23rd December, 2022 the supporting Affidavit, the supplementary Affidavit in support and all Annexures. We pray that the Petition issued and Notice of same be set aside as same is a nullity. Humbly submitted. Counsel for Petitioner/Respondent: We are opposed to the Motion. We deemed that it is irregularity which is curable under Order 81 of CI 47. Humbly submitted By Court – Ruling It is evident on the record that the Petitioner issued a petition whose Notice was to be served on the Respondent outside Ghana without Leave of the Court. See Petition issued on 11th November 2022. Subsequently, a Motion for Leave to issue Petition and for Leave to serve Notice of same on Respondent was filed on 24th November 2022. The assumption after granting said Motion was for the Applicant to issue the proposed Petition upon the leave granted by the court in said Order. However, the records show that no fresh Petition Pursuant to leave of court was filed after the Order dated 30th November 2022. This is the complaint per the instant Application. The Question to answer is whether or not this non-obedience or
non-compliance of the Order of the Court is one that goes to the root of the case or is one curable under Order 81 of CI 47 as amended. It is my considered opinion that where a condition precedent has not been complied with, with regards to an Originating process, the non-compliance goes to the root of the matter, that is the jurisdiction of this court and this trite learning. For the above reason, the Petition filed on 11th November, 2022 on which all order proceedings have been built is one filed in blatant disregard for the rules which go to non-compliance that touches the jurisdiction of the Court. That is no Leave being sought before the 11th November 2022 Petition was issued. In the circumstances, the said 11th November 2022 Petition and all Proceedings flowing therefore from is deemed a nullity and are to be set aside. The suit is in its entirety set aside for being a nullity. The Petitioner shall put her house in order and is at liberty to re-apply. Counsel for Respondent/Applicant: We pray for cost of Ten Thousand Ghana Cedis (GH₵10,000.00) Counsel for Petitioner/Respondent: We offer Five Hundred Ghana Cedis (GH₵500.00) By Court: Cost of Four Thousand Ghana Cedis (GH₵4,000.00) is awarded against the Petitioner. (SGD) H/H SEDINAM AWO BALOKAH
CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE Comfy* 3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.