Kwartekwei and 2 Others Vrs Crah [2023] GHAHC 350 (19 July 2023)
The plaintiff was within their rights to discontinue the previous suit and adequately compensated the defendant. There is no abuse of process as the interests of justice are best served by consolidating the suits rather than striking out the pleadings.
- Citation
- [2023] GHAHC 350
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Samuel Kwartekwei; Plaintiff: Judith Quartey; Plaintiff: Reginard Quartey; Defendant: Rose Crah
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application (motion to Strike Out Pleadings)
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Consolidation of Suits, Discontinuance of Action
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel Kwartekwei
Plaintiff
Judith Quartey
Plaintiff
Reginard Quartey
Plaintiff
Rose Crah
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application (motion to Strike Out Pleadings)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the instant suit constitutes an abuse of court process due to a previous similar suit between the same parties on the same subject matter
- 2 Whether the pleadings should be struck out as an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was within their rights to discontinue the previous suit and adequately compensated the defendant. There is no abuse of process as the interests of justice are best served by consolidating the suits rather than striking out the pleadings.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Suit to take its normal course
- Cost of GH¢1,500.00 awarded in plaintiff’s favor
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment