Lydia Mahama Aka Mrs. Lydia Akazara Suing Per Her Lawful Attorney Vrs Raphael Akazara [2023] GHACC 440 (11 August 2023)
The plaintiff is not a nominal plaintiff as she is suing for her own benefit through a lawful attorney, not for another person. Residence abroad alone does not justify security for costs. The application is misconceived and dismissed.
- Citation
- [2023] GHACC 440
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Lydia Mahama aka Mrs Lydia Akazara; Plaintiff's Attorney: Sabrina Alou Yao; Defendant/applicant: Raphael Akazara
- Court
- Circuit Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Motion for Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Nominal Plaintiff, Jurisdiction, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lydia Mahama aka Mrs Lydia Akazara
Plaintiff/respondent
Sabrina Alou Yao
Plaintiff's Attorney
Raphael Akazara
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Motion for Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff should be ordered to provide security for costs under Order 24 Rule 1(1)(a) & (b) of CI 47
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is a nominal plaintiff
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff is not a nominal plaintiff as she is suing for her own benefit through a lawful attorney, not for another person. Residence abroad alone does not justify security for costs. The application is misconceived and dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Costs of GH¢2,000.00 awarded against the defendant/applicant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment