NAA LEWISA NELSON VRS SLEDGE DUODU & ANOR. (LD/0088/2020) [2024] GHAHC 194 (26 February 2024)
Applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for stay of execution; application based on unreliable and self-serving evidence; court found facts suppressed or twisted and dismissed application.
- Citation
- NAA LEWISA NELSON VRS SLEDGE DUODU & ANOR. (LD/0088/2020) [2024] GHAHC 194 (26 February 2024)
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Naa Lewisa Nelson; 1st Defendant/appellant/applicant: Sledge Duodu; 2nd Defendant/appellant/applicant: Alhaji Taofeek Sulley
- Court
- ghahc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Land Dispute / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Recovery of Possession, Government Land, Declaratory Relief
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Naa Lewisa Nelson
Plaintiff/respondent
Sledge Duodu
1st Defendant/appellant/applicant
Alhaji Taofeek Sulley
2nd Defendant/appellant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Land Dispute / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal
- 2 Whether the judgment was merely declaratory or executable
- 3 Whether applicant demonstrated exceptional circumstances warranting stay
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for stay of execution; application based on unreliable and self-serving evidence; court found facts suppressed or twisted and dismissed application.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- costs of Ten Thousand Ghana Cedis (GH¢10,000.00) awarded to respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment