Mary Tsotsoo Laryea and 4 Others Vrs Amarkai Laryea [2018] GHASC 39 (7 June 2018)
The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to stay proceedings in the High Court in the absence of a substantive jurisdiction or statutory authority. Article 129(4) is auxiliary and cannot be invoked independently to grant the relief sought. The application is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [2018] GHASC 39
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent: Kwadwo Dankwa; Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent: Francis Adom; Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent: Kwaku Addae; Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent: Yaw Boateng; Defendant/respondent/appellant/applicant: Anglogold Ashanti Ltd
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 7 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Motion / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Proceedings, Jurisdiction, Limitation of Actions, Employment Status
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kwadwo Dankwa
Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent
Francis Adom
Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent
Kwaku Addae
Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent
Yaw Boateng
Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent
Anglogold Ashanti Ltd
Defendant/respondent/appellant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Motion / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to stay proceedings in the High Court under Article 129(4) of the Constitution, 1992
- 2 Whether the inherent jurisdiction of the Supreme Court can be invoked to stay proceedings in the High Court
- 3 Whether the application for stay of proceedings should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to stay proceedings in the High Court in the absence of a substantive jurisdiction or statutory authority. Article 129(4) is auxiliary and cannot be invoked independently to grant the relief sought. The application is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- application for stay of proceedings is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment