Kwadwo Dankwa and 3 Others Vrs Anglogold Ashanti Ltd [2018] GHASC 38 (7 June 2018)

Kwadwo Dankwa and 3 Others Vrs Anglogold Ashanti Ltd [2018] GHASC 38 (7 June 2018)

The Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to stay proceedings in the High Court under Article 129(4) of the Constitution, 1992, or its inherent jurisdiction, as no substantive jurisdiction or statutory authority was invoked. The application is therefore dismissed.

Citation
[2018] GHASC 38
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent: Kwadwo Dankwa; Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent: Francis Adom; Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent: Kwaku Addae; Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent: Yaw Boateng; Defendant/respondent/appellant/applicant: Anglogold Ashanti Ltd
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
7 June 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Motion / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Jurisdiction, Limitation of Actions, Employment Status
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Employment Law Constitutional Law Stay of Proceedings Jurisdiction Limitation of Actions Employment Status

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kwadwo Dankwa

Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent

Francis Adom

Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent

Kwaku Addae

Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent

Yaw Boateng

Plaintiff/appellant/respondent/respondent

Anglogold Ashanti Ltd

Defendant/respondent/appellant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Motion / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to stay proceedings in the High Court under Article 129(4) of the Constitution, 1992
  2. 2 Whether the inherent jurisdiction of the Supreme Court can be invoked to stay proceedings in the High Court
  3. 3 Whether the application for stay of proceedings should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to stay proceedings in the High Court under Article 129(4) of the Constitution, 1992, or its inherent jurisdiction, as no substantive jurisdiction or statutory authority was invoked. The application is therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • application for stay of proceedings is dismissed