The Republic vrs Jackson Caany (D4/02/2024) [2023] GHACC 995 (4 October 2023)
- Citation
- [2023] GHACC 995
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Court
- Circuit Court
- Posture
- Criminal / Final Judgment
- Case number
- D4/02/2024
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Circuit Court
- Posture
- Criminal / Final Judgment
- Case number
- D4/02/2024
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The accused, having pleaded guilty simpliciter to the charge of stealing, is convicted on his own plea and sentenced accordingly, considering time spent in custody and personal circumstances.
Court disposition
conviction and sentence
Orders
- Accused sentenced to 24 months imprisonment
- Stolen electric welding machine to be released to China Geo Corporation
02
Material facts
Parties
Republic
Prosecution Counsel: Chief Inspector Francis Opoku, Esq.Jackson Canny
AccusedAmounts and remedies
- Value of Property Stolen: GHS 5,000
- Time Spent in Custody (days): 55
- Sentence (months): 24
- Accused's Monthly Salary: GHS 1,000
- Accused's Rent Arrears: GHS 1,700
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Final Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the accused stole the electric welding machine contrary to section 124(1) of the Criminal Offence Act 1960 (Act 29)
- 02
Appropriate sentence upon plea of guilty
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The prosecution presented facts showing the accused misappropriated an electric welding machine valued at Ghs5,000, property of China Geo Corporation, and traced the stolen item to the accused through investigation.
- Respondent
- The accused pleaded for mercy, stating he was owing rent and his family was facing ejection, and that it was not his intention to commit the offence.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Criminal Offence Act 1960 (Act 29), section 124(1)
A plea of guilty simpliciter constitutes an admission of the offence and warrants conviction on own plea.
- 02
Sentencing principles under Ghanaian criminal law
Mitigating factors such as time spent in custody and personal circumstances may be considered in sentencing.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The accused, having pleaded guilty simpliciter to the charge of stealing, is convicted on his own plea and sentenced accordingly, considering time spent in custody and personal circumstances.
Court disposition
conviction and sentence
- Accused sentenced to 24 months imprisonment
- Stolen electric welding machine to be released to China Geo Corporation
Source and reliance status
Circuit Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Circuit Court
Judgment
BEFORE HER HONOUR NANA ADWOA SERWAA DUA-ADONTENG, JUDGE SITTING AT AKROPONG CIRCUIT COURT AT 4TH OCTOBER, 2023. CASE NO: D4/02/2024
THE REPUBLIC
VERSUS
JACKSON CAANY
FINAL JUDGEMENT Prosecution Represented by: Chief Inspector Francis Opoku, Esq. Accused Person is self-represented.
CHARGE Count one: The Accused Person is charged with the offense of stealing; contrary to section 124(1) of the Criminal Offence Act 1960 (Act 29), that he on 8th of August, 2023, at Atwima Ntesere in the Ashanti circuit and within the jurisdiction of this court, you misappropriated electric welding machine value at Ghs5,000, the property of China Geo Corporation.
PLEA The court explained the charge to the accused person in English and the same was interpreted to him in Twi, his language of choice. The court prior to taking the accused's plea explained the various pleas available to him and the consequence of taking each plea. The accused person pleaded Guilty Simpliciter.
FACTS The complainants are security men of Solid Rock Security Services based in Adum- Kumasi. Accused Persons Jackson Canny is an electric welder resident at Atwima Tabere. The complainants are providing security guards within the yard of the China Geo Corporation quarry site at Atwima Ntensere. The yard houses heavy industrial machines. On 9th of August, 2023 at 8:00am complainant received a report from some workers at the crushing side of the quarry, about an industrial welding machine belonging to the cooperation valued Ghs5,000.00 which was left the previous night after close of work being stolen at the site. On the same day a case was reported to the police. The complainant then mounted a search and followed tyre marks of the stolen welding machine to a point outside the yard of the quarry through intelligence, Jackson Canny was arrested. Investigation reveals that Jackson Canny is an electric welder employed by the China Geo Cooperation and works in the quarry site. During his duty tour, Accused Jackson Canny alternated from the Asphalting production site to the crashing production site till his duty tour was over. On the 8th August 2023 Accused worked at the Asphalting production site the whole day. In the investigation caution statement of Accused, he purported that after close of work on 8th August 2023 while walking in the yard, he cited the welding machine outside
the yard concealed in a brush and pushed the same to a different location 100 meters away from the crashing production site where the machine was originally placed. Accused further stated that he failed to report the incident to the management and that he called on Yahaya and informed him about the machine and where he had hidden the same. Further investigations revealed that the said Yahaya contracted one Abdul Kaadiri Tanko, a tricycle motor rider to convey the same to Akwatia line. The said Abdul Kadiri Tanko led police to Akwatia line where the machine was retrieved and retained. The said accomplice Yahaya could not be found and identified for his arrest. Strenuous effort is being made to arrest him for prosecution. Accused Jackson Canny was charged with the offence stated on the charge sheet and now before the honorable court. CONVICTION ON OWN PLEA COP) Having pleaded Guilty Simpliciter, the Accused person is convicted on His Own Plea for stealing.
PRIOR CONVICTION No evidence was presented to the court that the Accused Person has any prior criminal conviction.
PLEA OF MITIGATION The court inquired of the Accused Person to allocute for the offence he had been found guilty and convicted. ‘I plead for mercy. It was not my intention to do what I did. I was owing my landlady Ghs1,700.00 rent and my family was on the verge of ejection.’ PRE-SENTENCING PROCEDURE Time spent in custody: Accused Person had been on remand since 11th August 2023. Value of property stolen: Ghs5,000. The item was received and it is in the custody of the police to be released to its owner. The court inquired from the prosecutor if the property received was in good condition. Prosecutor told the court that it was. The court inquired from the Accused Person if he is married. Accused Person told the court that he was not married. The court inquired from the Accused Person if he had children. Accused Person told the court that yes, he had two children aged 4 years and 8 years The court inquired from the Accused Person about his job. Accused Person told the court that he was an electric and gas welder. The court inquired from the Accused Person if his family was in court. Accused Person said yes, his mother and younger brother were in court. Allocation: Accused Person do you have anything to say to the court? Wages: How much did you earn monthly. My salary was Ghc1000. I was taking care of my children, their mother and my mother. The court inquired from the Accused Person about the work of his wife? Accused Person told the court that she is currently not working.
SENTENCE Having considered all factors above, particularly the time spent by Accused in lawful custody, Accused person is sentenced to 24 months in prison, and the electric welder machine is to be released to its owner China Geo Corporation. H/H. NANA ADWOA SERWAA DUA-ADONTENG (CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE)
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.