Sherrill Vrs Hanson [2022] GHADC 54 (29 November 2022)
The petitioner established, on a balance of probabilities, that the respondent's conduct—comprising threats, abuse, and emotional distress—amounted to unreasonable behaviour, making it unreasonable to expect her to continue living with him. The respondent's allegations of adultery were unproven. Attempts at reconciliation failed, and both parties ultimately sought dissolution. The marriage was found to have broken down beyond reconciliation.
- Citation
- [2022] GHADC 54
- Parties
- Petitioner: Mary Sherrill; Respondent: Stephen Kwesi Hanson
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed; marriage dissolved.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Custody of Children, Maintenance, Unreasonable Behaviour
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Sherrill
Petitioner
Stephen Kwesi Hanson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage has broken down beyond reconciliation
- 2 Whether the petitioner has established unreasonable behaviour by the respondent
- 3 Whether the respondent proved adultery by the petitioner
Ratio Decidendi
The petitioner established, on a balance of probabilities, that the respondent's conduct—comprising threats, abuse, and emotional distress—amounted to unreasonable behaviour, making it unreasonable to expect her to continue living with him. The respondent's allegations of adultery were unproven. Attempts at reconciliation failed, and both parties ultimately sought dissolution. The marriage was found to have broken down beyond reconciliation.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed; marriage dissolved.
Orders
- Decree of divorce granted; marriage certificate cancelled.
- Custody of three children granted to petitioner with reasonable access to respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment