Ghana Judgment

High Court

Japan Motors Trading Co. Ltd Vrs Attorney General [2023] GHAHC 104 (2 March 2023)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The defendant/respondent failed to file any affidavit in opposition or set up a bona fide defence, and no triable issues were raised; therefore, summary judgment is granted as prayed.

Court disposition

application for summary judgment granted

Orders

  • summary judgment granted as prayed

02

Material facts

Parties

Japan Motors Trading Co. Ltd

Plaintiff/applicant Counsel: Rosamond Awurabena Atta-Kesson holding brief of David Kudoadzi

Attorney General

Defendant/respondent Counsel: Ivy Vanderpuije (PSA)

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Summary Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the plaintiff/applicant is entitled to summary judgment due to absence of a bona fide defence

Party arguments

Applicant
The plaintiff/applicant claims entitlement to summary judgment as the defendant/respondent has not filed any affidavit in opposition and has not set up a bona fide defence or raised any triable issues.
Respondent
The defendant/respondent, through counsel, indicated no opposition to the application for summary judgment.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    court's reasoning

    Summary judgment may be granted where the defendant fails to set up a bona fide defence or raise triable issues.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The defendant/respondent failed to file any affidavit in opposition or set up a bona fide defence, and no triable issues were raised; therefore, summary judgment is granted as prayed.

Court disposition

application for summary judgment granted

  • summary judgment granted as prayed

Source and reliance status

High Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court

Judgment

[2023] GHAHC 104

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AT LAW COURT COMPLEX, ACCRA (GENERAL JURISDICTION 11) HELD IN ACCRA ON THURSDAY THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP RICHARD APIETU (J) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUIT NO.: GJ/0036/2023 JAPAN MOTORS TRADING CO. LTD - PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT VRS.

ATTORNEY GENERAL - DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY JUDGMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I have perused the Affidavit of Richard Khimson of Accra, the Deponent herein filed on 20th January 2023, in support of Motion on Notice for Summary Judgment. I have heard the submissions of Rosamond Awurabena Atta-Kesson Esq., Counsel for and on behalf of the Applicant herein. I have noted that even though on 24th January 2023, the notice of the Application for Summary Judgment was served on the Defendant, the Defendant up to today 2nd March 2023, has not filed any Affidavit in Opposition. I have also heard the submissions of Ivy Vanderpuije (PSA), Counsel for and on behalf of the Respondent that she is not opposed to the Application. It is my view that the Plaintiff/Applicant’s claim is clear and the Defendant/Respondent has not set up a bonafida defence to the claim neither has the Defendant/Respondent created a situation indicating that there are triable issues between the Defendant/Respondent and the Plaintiff/Applicant. In the circumstances, the Application for summary Judgment is hereby granted as prayed. (SGD)

JUSTICE RICHARD APIETU (HIGH COURT JUDGE) COUNSEL: ROSAMOND AWURABENA ATTA-KESSON HOLDING BRIEF OF DAVID KUDOADZI FOR THE PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT IVY VANDERPUIJE (PSA) FOR THE DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT 2

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.