Japan Motors Trading Co. Ltd Vrs Attorney General [2023] GHAHC 104 (2 March 2023)
- Citation
- [2023] GHAHC 104
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Court
- High Court
- Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court
- Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The defendant/respondent failed to file any affidavit in opposition or set up a bona fide defence, and no triable issues were raised; therefore, summary judgment is granted as prayed.
Court disposition
application for summary judgment granted
Orders
- summary judgment granted as prayed
02
Material facts
Parties
Japan Motors Trading Co. Ltd
Plaintiff/applicant Counsel: Rosamond Awurabena Atta-Kesson holding brief of David KudoadziAttorney General
Defendant/respondent Counsel: Ivy Vanderpuije (PSA)03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the plaintiff/applicant is entitled to summary judgment due to absence of a bona fide defence
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The plaintiff/applicant claims entitlement to summary judgment as the defendant/respondent has not filed any affidavit in opposition and has not set up a bona fide defence or raised any triable issues.
- Respondent
- The defendant/respondent, through counsel, indicated no opposition to the application for summary judgment.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
court's reasoning
Summary judgment may be granted where the defendant fails to set up a bona fide defence or raise triable issues.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The defendant/respondent failed to file any affidavit in opposition or set up a bona fide defence, and no triable issues were raised; therefore, summary judgment is granted as prayed.
Court disposition
application for summary judgment granted
- summary judgment granted as prayed
Source and reliance status
High Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court
Judgment
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AT LAW COURT COMPLEX, ACCRA (GENERAL JURISDICTION 11) HELD IN ACCRA ON THURSDAY THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP RICHARD APIETU (J) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUIT NO.: GJ/0036/2023 JAPAN MOTORS TRADING CO. LTD - PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT VRS.
ATTORNEY GENERAL - DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY JUDGMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I have perused the Affidavit of Richard Khimson of Accra, the Deponent herein filed on 20th January 2023, in support of Motion on Notice for Summary Judgment. I have heard the submissions of Rosamond Awurabena Atta-Kesson Esq., Counsel for and on behalf of the Applicant herein. I have noted that even though on 24th January 2023, the notice of the Application for Summary Judgment was served on the Defendant, the Defendant up to today 2nd March 2023, has not filed any Affidavit in Opposition. I have also heard the submissions of Ivy Vanderpuije (PSA), Counsel for and on behalf of the Respondent that she is not opposed to the Application. It is my view that the Plaintiff/Applicant’s claim is clear and the Defendant/Respondent has not set up a bonafida defence to the claim neither has the Defendant/Respondent created a situation indicating that there are triable issues between the Defendant/Respondent and the Plaintiff/Applicant. In the circumstances, the Application for summary Judgment is hereby granted as prayed. (SGD)
JUSTICE RICHARD APIETU (HIGH COURT JUDGE) COUNSEL: ROSAMOND AWURABENA ATTA-KESSON HOLDING BRIEF OF DAVID KUDOADZI FOR THE PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT IVY VANDERPUIJE (PSA) FOR THE DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT 2
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.