Republic Vrs National House Of Chiefs Kumasi [2017] GHASC 27 (15 June 2017)

Republic Vrs National House Of Chiefs Kumasi [2017] GHASC 27 (15 June 2017)

The order of Mandamus has already been complied with by entering the respondents' names in the National Register of Chiefs; therefore, there is nothing left to restrain or suspend, and the application for interlocutory injunction is refused.

Citation
[2017] GHASC 27
Parties
Applicant: The Republic; 1st Respondent/appellant: The National House of Chiefs; 2nd Respondent/appellant: The Brong-Ahafo Regional House of Chiefs; Applicants/respondents: Nana Oduro Boamah & 3 Others; 1st Interested Party/respondent: Asanteman Council; 2nd Interested Party/appellant/applicant: Techiman Traditional Council
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
15 June 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
Mandamus, Interlocutory Injunction, Mootness, Jurisdiction
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Republic

Applicant

The National House of Chiefs

1st Respondent/appellant

The Brong-Ahafo Regional House of Chiefs

2nd Respondent/appellant

Nana Oduro Boamah & 3 Others

Applicants/respondents

Asanteman Council

1st Interested Party/respondent

Techiman Traditional Council

2nd Interested Party/appellant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether an interlocutory injunction should issue to restrain enforcement of a mandamus order already complied with
  2. 2 Whether the application is moot due to compliance with the High Court order
  3. 3 Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in chieftaincy matters

Ratio Decidendi

The order of Mandamus has already been complied with by entering the respondents' names in the National Register of Chiefs; therefore, there is nothing left to restrain or suspend, and the application for interlocutory injunction is refused.

Court Disposition

Application refused