Ghana Judgment

ghacc

THE REPUBLIC VS EMMANUEL MENSAH (D4/02/2024) [2024] GHACC 128 (20 February 2024)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Accused pleaded guilty simpliciter to theft of mobile phone and was convicted on his own plea; sentence imposed considering time spent in custody and value of property stolen.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • accused sentenced to 4 months imprisonment
  • sim card to be released to complainant

02

Material facts

Parties

The Republic

Prosecution Counsel: Detective Inspector Alexander Agbekpornu

Emmanuel Mensah

Accused

Amounts and remedies

  • Value of Property Stolen: GHS 1,200
  • Time Spent in Custody (days): 3
  • Sentence (months): 4

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Final Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

whether the accused stole the complainant's mobile phone

Party arguments

Applicant
I plead for mercy. It was not my intention to do what I did.
Respondent
Accused pleaded guilty simpliciter to the charge of theft.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Ghana criminal procedure

    Conviction on own plea of guilty simpliciter

  2. 02

    Ghana sentencing guidelines

    Sentencing considers time spent in lawful custody and value of property stolen

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Accused pleaded guilty simpliciter to theft of mobile phone and was convicted on his own plea; sentence imposed considering time spent in custody and value of property stolen.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced

  • accused sentenced to 4 months imprisonment
  • sim card to be released to complainant

Source and reliance status

ghacc · 20 February 2024

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

ghacc

Judgment· 20 February 2024

THE REPUBLIC VS EMMANUEL MENSAH (D4/02/2024) [2024] GHACC 128 (20 February 2024)

BEFORE HER HONOUR NANA ADWOA SERWAA DUA-ADONTENG, JUDGE SITTING AT AKROPONG CIRCUIT COURT AT 20TH FEBRUARY, 2024. CASE NO: D4/02/2024

THE REPUBLIC

VERSUS

EMMANUEL MENSAH

FINAL JUDGEMENT Prosecution Represented by: Detective Inspector Alexander Agbekpornu Accused Person is self-represented.

CHARGE For that about three weeks ago at Abuakwa in the Ashanti Rehion and within the jurisdiction of this court, did steal one Nokia C-21 mobile phone valued Ghs1,200 the property of one Joyce Anorkyewaa.

PLEA The court explained the charge to the accused person in English and the same was interpreted to him in Twi, his language of choice. The court prior to taking the accused's plea explained the various pleas available to him and the consequence of taking each plea. The accused person pleaded Guilty Simpliciter.

FACTS The complainant, Joyce Anokyewaa is a Seamstress staying at Abuakwa Manhyia whereas accused Emmanuel Mensah is a mason and reside at Akropong. About three weeks ago, complainant went to town at Kumasi to buy some sewing materials for her job and on her return to the shop at Abuakwa she left her purse containing Nokia C-21 mobile phone valued at Ghs1,200 and cash Ghs35 in the TD urvan mini bus she boarded. Accused got hold of the phone but refused to return it to complainant upon several calls received in request for the phone. Accused later disposed of the phone and inserted the sim card into his phone which he used as his personal line. Whenever complainant called her line, accused claimed the line belonged to him. In order to get accused arrested, the complainant arranged with one of her apprentices, a witness in this case, who called the accused and feigned she fell in love with him. She suggested that accused should know her house at Abuakwa for him to visit her house and he was arrested by police. A search conducted on accused and complainant’s sim card was retrieved. After investigations he was charged with the offence before this honourable court. CONVICTION ON OWN PLEA COP) Having pleaded Guilty Simpliciter, the Accused person is convicted on His Own Plea for stealing.

PRIOR CONVICTION No evidence was presented to the court that the Accused Person has any prior criminal conviction.

PLEA OF MITIGATION The court inquired of the Accused Person to allocute for the offence he had been found guilty and convicted. ‘I plead for mercy. It was not my intention to do what I did.” PRE-SENTENCING PROCEDURE Time spent in custody: Accused Person was arrested on 16/02/2024 and presented before court on 19/02/2024 Value of property stolen: Mobile phone valued at Ghs1,200. Only the sim card was received and it is in the custody of the police to be released to its owner. The court inquired from the prosecutor if the property received was in good condition. Prosecutor told the court that it was.

SENTENCE Having considered all factors above, particularly the time spent by Accused in lawful custody, accused person is sentenced to 4 months in prison, and the sim card is to be released to its owner the complainant. H/H. NANA ADWOA SERWAA DUA-ADONTENG (CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE)

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.