REPUBLIC VRS AGYEMANG (201/2023) [2024] GHACC 231 (29 May 2024)

REPUBLIC VRS AGYEMANG (201/2023) [2024] GHACC 231 (29 May 2024)

The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused intended to put the complainant in fear of death or that the complainant expected death at the hands of the accused. Contradictions in witness testimony and lack of corroboration created reasonable doubt, requiring acquittal.

Citation
REPUBLIC VRS AGYEMANG (201/2023) [2024] GHACC 231 (29 May 2024)
Parties
Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Kwadwo Agyemang
Court
ghacc
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
29 May 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Outcome
acquittal and discharge
Legal Topics
Threat of Death, Burden of Proof, Contradictory Evidence
Source Language
eng

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Republic

Prosecution

Kwadwo Agyemang

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the accused threatened the complainant with death contrary to Section 75 of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29)
  2. 2 Whether the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused intended to put the complainant in fear of death or that the complainant expected death at the hands of the accused. Contradictions in witness testimony and lack of corroboration created reasonable doubt, requiring acquittal.

Court Disposition

acquittal and discharge

Orders

  • The accused person is acquitted and discharged.