Prempeh Vrs Ofei-kwapong [2020] GHASC 138 (21 October 2020)
The plaintiff failed to prove the root of title to the disputed land, and the land was found to fall within the Osae Family land as previously adjudged. The acts of possession by the plaintiff were insufficient to establish ownership. There were no grounds to disturb the concurrent findings of the lower courts.
- Citation
- Prempeh Vrs Ofei-kwapong [2020] GHASC 138 (21 October 2020)
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant/appellant: Agya Boakye Atomsah Prempeh; Defendant/respondent/respondent: Eric Ofei-Kwapong
- Court
- ghasc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appeal Before Supreme Court
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Title to Land, Concurrent Findings, Burden of Proof, Possession, Boundaries
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Agya Boakye Atomsah Prempeh
Plaintiff/appellant/appellant
Eric Ofei-Kwapong
Defendant/respondent/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appeal Before Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff proved root of title to the disputed land
- 2 Whether the land in dispute falls within the land adjudged to Osae Family by the Supreme Court
- 3 Whether acts of possession by the plaintiff were sufficient to establish ownership
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed to prove the root of title to the disputed land, and the land was found to fall within the Osae Family land as previously adjudged. The acts of possession by the plaintiff were insufficient to establish ownership. There were no grounds to disturb the concurrent findings of the lower courts.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed in its entirety.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment