REPUBLIC VRS SALIFU & 2 OTHERS (NR/NG/DC/78/22) [2023] GHADC 966 (16 November 2023)
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused persons were in possession or control of cannabis for use without lawful authority, as the evidence did not conclusively link the accused to the cannabis found at the scene.
- Citation
- [2023] GHADC 966
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Braimah Salifu; Accused: Abdul Samed Mohammed; Accused: Munkaila Mumuni
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2023
- Case Number
- NR/NG/DC/78/22
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- acquittal and discharge
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Possession of Narcotic Drugs, Burden of Proof, Evidence, Acquittal
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
Braimah Salifu
Accused
Abdul Samed Mohammed
Accused
Munkaila Mumuni
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused persons were in unlawful possession of narcotic drugs for use without lawful authority
- 2 Whether the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused persons were in possession or control of cannabis for use without lawful authority, as the evidence did not conclusively link the accused to the cannabis found at the scene.
Court Disposition
acquittal and discharge
Orders
- A1, A2 and A3 are acquitted and discharged of the offence of Unlawful Possession of Narcotic Drugs contrary to section 37(1) and (2)(a) of the Narcotic Control Commission Act, 2020 (Act 1019).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment