Ashun Vrs Accra Brewery Ltd. [2008] GHASC 21 (12 November 2008)

Ashun Vrs Accra Brewery Ltd. [2008] GHASC 21 (12 November 2008)

The acceptance of the redundancy package by the plaintiff constituted a mutual agreement, extinguishing his right to further claims or negotiation. The Labour (Amendment) Decree 1969 did not impose a duty of negotiation in redundancy situations, and there was no statutory or contractual provision requiring such negotiation. The termination was not wrongful or unlawful.

Citation
[2008] GHASC 21
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Lt. Col. S. B. Ashun; Defendant/respondent: Accra Brewery Ltd.
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
12 November 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Wrongful Termination, Redundancy, Severance Pay, Contractual Obligations
Source Language
English
Employment Law Contract Law Wrongful Termination Redundancy Severance Pay Contractual Obligations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lt. Col. S. B. Ashun

Plaintiff/appellant

Accra Brewery Ltd.

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether acceptance of a severance package estops an employee from seeking further negotiation or legal redress regarding severance pay
  2. 2 Whether the Labour (Amendment) Decree 1969, NLCD 342, imposed a duty of negotiation on the parties in redundancy situations
  3. 3 Whether the termination of the plaintiff's employment was wrongful or unlawful

Ratio Decidendi

The acceptance of the redundancy package by the plaintiff constituted a mutual agreement, extinguishing his right to further claims or negotiation. The Labour (Amendment) Decree 1969 did not impose a duty of negotiation in redundancy situations, and there was no statutory or contractual provision requiring such negotiation. The termination was not wrongful or unlawful.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed