Republic Vrs Bosompem and Others [2022] GHAHC 43 (19 December 2022)
The Respondents, having been duly served with the application for interlocutory injunction, continued to develop the disputed land during the pendency of the suit, thereby interfering with the administration of justice and bringing the court into disrepute. The Applicant proved the case of contempt beyond reasonable doubt against both Respondents.
- Citation
- [2022] GHAHC 43
- Parties
- Applicant: Yaw Dankwah Agyekum; 1st Respondent: Kwesi Bosompem; 2nd Respondent: Nana Osei a.k.a Raphael Attoh Armah
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt of Court Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Respondents convicted of contempt and sentenced to one month imprisonment with hard labour each.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt Proceedings, Service of Process, Interlocutory Injunction, Land Dispute
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yaw Dankwah Agyekum
Applicant
Kwesi Bosompem
1st Respondent
Nana Osei a.k.a Raphael Attoh Armah
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondents are liable for contempt of court for developing disputed land during pendency of suit and after service of interlocutory injunction application
Ratio Decidendi
The Respondents, having been duly served with the application for interlocutory injunction, continued to develop the disputed land during the pendency of the suit, thereby interfering with the administration of justice and bringing the court into disrepute. The Applicant proved the case of contempt beyond reasonable doubt against both Respondents.
Court Disposition
Respondents convicted of contempt and sentenced to one month imprisonment with hard labour each.
Orders
- Bench warrant issued against 1st and 2nd Respondents for commencement of sentence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment