Ohemeng Vrs Anthony and Another [2022] GHADC 258 (18 October 2022)
Plaintiff failed to prove entitlement to the stool or the reliefs sought, as no successor to the Twafohene's stool had been elected and Plaintiff's claim to succession was unsubstantiated. The evidence showed Plaintiff was not entitled to the proceeds or possession of the farm.
- Citation
- [2022] GHADC 258
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Yaw Ohemeng; 1st Defendant: Akwasi Anthony; 2nd Defendant: Samuel Boakye Dankwah
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stool Land Ownership, Account for Proceeds, Eviction, Injunction, Family Succession
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yaw Ohemeng
Plaintiff
Akwasi Anthony
1st Defendant
Samuel Boakye Dankwah
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Plaintiff is entitled to account for proceeds from the cocoa farm
- 2 Whether Plaintiff is entitled to eviction of Defendants from the farm
- 3 Whether Plaintiff is entitled to a perpetual injunction against Defendants
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff failed to prove entitlement to the stool or the reliefs sought, as no successor to the Twafohene's stool had been elected and Plaintiff's claim to succession was unsubstantiated. The evidence showed Plaintiff was not entitled to the proceeds or possession of the farm.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment