呂良森 對 警務處

呂良森 對 警務處

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate that the proposed appeal raised issues of wide public importance or public safety as required by section 22(1) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance; the applicant's grounds were general and insufficient.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
呂良森 對 警務處
Parties
Applicant: 呂良森; Proposed Respondent: 警務處
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
27 March 2017
Case Number
CACV176/2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Final Appeal
Outcome
application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Public Interest, Public Safety, Permission to Appeal Criteria
Source Language
ch
Administrative Law Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Public Interest Public Safety Permission to Appeal Criteria

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

呂良森

Applicant

警務處

Proposed Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Final Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proposed appeal involves matters of wide public importance or public safety as required by section 22(1) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's grounds sufficiently demonstrate public importance or public safety to justify granting leave to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate that the proposed appeal raised issues of wide public importance or public safety as required by section 22(1) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance; the applicant's grounds were general and insufficient.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal refused
  • Proposed respondent not required to participate (order dated 13 March 2017)