梅冬庭 對 香港社會福利署
The court exercised its discretion to assess costs by summary procedure and fixed the appellant's liability for the respondent's costs at HKD50,000 because the issues and documents were not complex or materially different from the original hearing and the application to admit new evidence was not difficult.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] HKCA 329
- Parties
- Applicant: 梅冬庭; Respondent: 香港社會福利署
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 April 2019
- Case Number
- CACV214/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) / Costs Assessment Following Dismissal of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay respondent's costs assessed at HKD50,000.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Appeal, Application to Adduce New Evidence
- Source Language
- ch
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
梅冬庭
Applicant
香港社會福利署
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) / Costs Assessment Following Dismissal of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant must pay the respondent's costs following dismissal of the appeal
- 2 Appropriate amount for the respondent's costs to be assessed by summary procedure
- 3 Whether the application to admit new evidence warranted additional or complex costs assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to assess costs by summary procedure and fixed the appellant's liability for the respondent's costs at HKD50,000 because the issues and documents were not complex or materially different from the original hearing and the application to admit new evidence was not difficult.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay respondent's costs assessed at HKD50,000.
Orders
- Applicant to pay respondent's costs of the appeal, assessed at HKD50,000 by summary procedure
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CACV 214/2018 [2019] HKCA 329 香港特別行政區 高等法院上訴法庭 民事上訴案件2018年第214號 (原本案件編號:高等法院憲法及行政訴訟2018年第727號) 申請人 梅冬庭 及 建議答辯人 香港社會福利署 主審法官: 高等法院上訴法庭副庭長關淑馨 高等法院上訴法庭法官袁家寧 高等法院上訴法庭法官朱芬齡 判決書日期:2019年4月3日 判決書 (訟費評定) 上訴法庭法官朱芬齡頒發上訴法庭判決書: 本庭在2019年2月11日頒發判案書,撤銷申請人的上訴,及命令申請人支付建議答辯人本上訴的訟費,包括在上訴中提交新證據的申請的訟費,金額循簡易程序評估。 建議答辯人根據法庭的指示,在2019年2月25日提交了訟費陳述書。申請人在2019年3月8日提交了陳述書,表示不懂得釐計訟費,及尊重法庭釐定的結果。 本庭考慮了建議答辯人的訟費陳述書,亦考慮到上訴涉及的議題及文件不太複雜,與原審時沒有重大分別,提交新證據的申請也不困難,認為50,000元是合適的訟費金額。因此,本庭把申請人按2019年2月11日命令須支付建議答辯人的訟費評定為50,000元。 (關淑馨) 高等法院 上訴法庭副庭長 (袁家寧) 高等法院 上訴法庭法官 (朱芬齡) 高等法院 上訴法庭法官 原告人:無律師代表,親自應訊 建議答辯人:由律政司署理高級政府律師朱志欣代表