楊嬡 對 聯旺集團控股有限公司及另一人
The notice of motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was dismissed because section 63B of the District Court Ordinance bars appeals against Court of Appeal decisions on whether to grant leave, rendering the application legally baseless.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] HKCA 892
- Parties
- Plaintiff: 楊嬡; First Defendant: 聯旺集團控股有限公司; Second Defendant: 耀才證券國際(香港)有限公司
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 October 2024
- Case Number
- CAMP273/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Final Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed; no order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Appealability of Permission Decisions, District Court Ordinance S63 B
- Source Language
- ch
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
楊嬡
Plaintiff
聯旺集團控股有限公司
First Defendant
耀才證券國際(香港)有限公司
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Final Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Court of Appeal decision on whether to grant leave to appeal is itself appealable
- 2 Whether the applicant's notice of motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal had any legal basis
- 3 Whether the court should dismiss the notice of motion and make any order as to costs
Ratio Decidendi
The notice of motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was dismissed because section 63B of the District Court Ordinance bars appeals against Court of Appeal decisions on whether to grant leave, rendering the application legally baseless.
Court Disposition
application dismissed; no order as to costs
Orders
- Dismissed the applicant's notice of motion dated 3 July 2024 seeking permission to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CAMP 273/2023, [2024] HKCA 892 On Appeal From [2023] HKDC 126 香港特別行政區 高等法院 上訴法庭 雜項案件2023年第273號 (擬上訴的原本案件:區域法院民事訴訟2022年第2467號) ____________ 原告人 楊嬡 及 第一被告人 聯旺集團控股有限公司 第二被告人 耀才證券國際(香港)有限公司 ____________ 主審法官 : 高等法院上訴法庭法官林雲浩 高等法院原訟法庭法官陳健強 判決書日期 : 2024年10月2日 判決書 由上訴法庭法官林雲浩頒發上訴法庭判決書: 本庭已於2024年5月23的裁決撤銷了原告人的上訴許可申請,並於2024年6月18日的判決書中指出,根據香港法例第336章《區域法院條例》第63B條,就上訴法庭對應否批予上訴許可所作的決定,任何人都不得提出上訴。 原告人於2024年7月3日以提出動議通知書,申請許可針對本庭2024年6月18日的判決向終審法院提出上訴。這申請明顯沒有法律基礎,因此本庭撤銷原告人的提出動議通知書,不作訟費命令。 (林雲浩) (陳健強) 高等法院上訴法庭法官 高等法院原訟法庭法官 原告人: 無律師代表, 呈交書面陳詞