香港特別行政區 訴 溫漢錫
Because the offence was serious, the evidence against the appellant was strong, and a correct and full direction to the jury would likely have led to conviction, it was in the interests of justice and public interest to remit the case for retrial; the appellant was remanded pending retrial.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCA 828
- Parties
- Appellant: 溫漢錫; Respondent: 香港特別行政區
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2018
- Case Number
- CACC327/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Conviction (drug Trafficking) / Leave to Appeal Granted; Conviction and Sentence Quashed; Remitted for Retrial; Appellant Remanded Pending Retrial
- Outcome
- Conviction and sentence quashed; case remitted to trial court for retrial; appellant remanded in custody pending retrial.
- Legal Topics
- Drug Trafficking, Conviction Appeal, Remittal for Retrial, Public Interest, Jury Directions
- Source Language
- ch
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
溫漢錫
Appellant
香港特別行政區
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Conviction (drug Trafficking) / Leave to Appeal Granted; Conviction and Sentence Quashed; Remitted for Retrial; Appellant Remanded Pending Retrial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to order a retrial after quashing the conviction
- 2 Whether the original conviction was unsafe due to trial error
- 3 Whether public interest and strength of evidence justify remittal for retrial
Ratio Decidendi
Because the offence was serious, the evidence against the appellant was strong, and a correct and full direction to the jury would likely have led to conviction, it was in the interests of justice and public interest to remit the case for retrial; the appellant was remanded pending retrial.
Court Disposition
Conviction and sentence quashed; case remitted to trial court for retrial; appellant remanded in custody pending retrial.
Orders
- Conviction quashed
- Sentence quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CACC 327/2017 [2018] HKCA 828 香港特別行政區 高等法院上訴法庭 刑事司法管轄權 不服定罪上訴許可申請 刑事上訴案件2017年第327號 (原高等法院刑事案件2017年第178號) __________________ 答辯人 香港特別行政區 對 上訴人 溫漢錫 __________________ 主審法官: 高等法院上訴法庭法官張澤祐 高等法院上訴法庭法官潘兆初 高等法院原訟法庭法官黃崇厚 書面陳詞日期: 2018年10月31日及11月1日 判案書日期: 2018年11月15日 判 案 書 上訴法庭法官潘兆初頒發上訴法庭判案書: 上訴人被控一項「販運危險藥物」罪,在審訊後被定罪及判監8年半。他不服定罪而提出上訴許可申請。2018年10月25日,本庭頒下判案書,批准其上訴許可申請,視之為正式上訴並判上訴得直,及撤銷上訴人的定罪及判刑。本庭繼而指示與訟雙方就是否重審的議題呈交書面陳詞,之後本庭會以書面形式處理。 答辯人申請將上訴人的案件發還重審,而上訴人則不作陳詞。 本庭認為,本案控罪嚴重,涉案毒品為25.5克冰毒,上訴人一經定罪的話判刑會超過8年。而且,針對上訴人的證據看來是強而有力的,在法庭正確和充份的指引下,陪審員有很大機會將上訴人定罪。 因此,本庭認為重審是符合公義和公眾利益的,所以命令將本案發還原訟法庭重審。在等候重審直至重審完結為止,上訴人還押懲教署。 (張澤祐) (潘兆初) (黃崇厚) 高等法院上訴法庭法官 高等法院上訴法庭法官 高等法院原訟法庭法官 上訴人: 由法律援助署委派尹楊律師事務所轉聘孔慶碩大律師代表。 答辯人: 由律政司高級檢控官關百安代表。