蔡 對 蔡
Section 63B of the District Court Ordinance prohibits any appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision on whether to grant permission to appeal; therefore the application to permit an appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was legally barred and is dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCA 993
- Parties
- Applicant: 蔡; Respondent: 蔡
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2018
- Case Number
- CAMP129/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Jurisdiction / Application for Permission to Appeal to the Court of Final Appeal After Court of Appeal Refused Leave
- Outcome
- Application dismissed as legally baseless; permission to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Finality of Appellate Permission, Statutory Bar to Appeal, Costs
- Source Language
- ch
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
蔡
Applicant
蔡
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Jurisdiction / Application for Permission to Appeal to the Court of Final Appeal After Court of Appeal Refused Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal lies from a Court of Appeal decision refusing permission to appeal
- 2 Whether s.63B of the District Court Ordinance bars any further appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision on permission to appeal
- 3 Whether the application had any legal basis and whether costs should be ordered
Ratio Decidendi
Section 63B of the District Court Ordinance prohibits any appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision on whether to grant permission to appeal; therefore the application to permit an appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was legally barred and is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed as legally baseless; permission to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal refused.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CAMP 129/2018 [2018] HKCA 993 香港特別行政區 高等法院上訴法庭 民事司法管轄權 案件編號:雜項案件 2018 年第129號 (擬上訴的原本案件:區域法院婚姻訴訟2014 年第 10863號) 呈請人 蔡 與 答辯人 蔡 審理法官:高等法院上訴法庭法官張澤祐 高等法院上訴法庭法官關淑馨 高等法院上訴法庭法官潘兆初 答辯人書面陳詞日期:2018 年 12 月 12 日 判決書日期:2018 年 12 月 19 日 判決書 上訴法庭法官張澤祐頒發上訴法庭判決書: 本庭在2018年11月21日駁回男方(答辯人)的上訴,拒絕其逾期上訴許可的申請。現男方提出動議通知書,要求本庭給予許可,讓他向終審法院提出上訴。 《區域法院條例》( 香港法例第336章)第63(B)條清楚說明「就上訴法庭對應否批予向它提出上訴的上訴許可所作的決定,任何人不得提出上訴」。換句話說,上訴法庭就上訴許可所作出的決定是最終的決定,申請人是無權利向終審法院提出進一步的上訴。由於申請是沒有法律基礎的,因此本庭撤銷男方的申請。 本庭就本申請不作出任何訟費命令。 (張澤祐) 高等法院上訴 法庭法官 (關淑馨) 高等法院上訴 法庭法官 (潘兆初) 高等法院上訴 法庭法官 呈請人:無律師代表, 親自行事。 答辯人:無律師代表, 親自行事。