香港特別行政區 訴 鄧桂枝
The application for leave to appeal against sentence was refused because the sentence (30 months) fell within the applicable guideline range for trafficking under 10g, the trial judge properly accounted for a 15% personal use reduction and the applicant's 16 prior convictions, and there were no arguable grounds...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] HKCA 257
- Parties
- Respondent: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (香港特別行政區); Applicant: 鄧桂枝 (TANG KWAI CHI GI GI)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2019
- Case Number
- CACC256/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal — Sentence Appeal (application for Leave) / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Drug Trafficking, Failure to Produce Identification, Sentence Length, Mitigation, Previous Convictions
- Source Language
- ch
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (香港特別行政區)
Respondent
鄧桂枝 (TANG KWAI CHI GI GI)
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal — Sentence Appeal (application for Leave) / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive
- 2 Appropriate sentencing range for trafficking cocaine under 10 grams
- 3 Whether allowance for personal use portion affects sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal against sentence was refused because the sentence (30 months) fell within the applicable guideline range for trafficking under 10g, the trial judge properly accounted for a 15% personal use reduction and the applicant's 16 prior convictions, and there were no arguable grounds demonstrating the sentence was manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CACC 256/2018 [2019] HKCA 257 香港特別行政區 高等法院上訴法庭 刑事司法管轄權 判刑上訴許可申請 刑事上訴案件2018年第256號 (原區域法院刑事案件2018年第390號) 答辯人 香港特別行政區 對 申請人 鄧桂枝(TANG KWAI CHI GI GI) 主審法官: 高等法院署理首席法官楊振權 聆訊日期: 2019年2月27日 判案書日期: 2019年2月27日 判案書 申請人(鄧桂枝)承認了一項“販毒”罪和一項未能在規定下出示身分證明文件罪後,分別被判處入獄30個月和罰款1,000元。 申請人不服判刑,現提出上訴許可申請,要求獲准就判刑上訴。申請人沒有提出具體的上訴理由,而只是泛指她面對的刑期過長。 首項控罪共涉及39袋霹靂可卡因,總重量是7.36克,巿值約為港幣9,900元。根據有關判刑指引,販運10克以內可卡因,量刑基準是2-5年監禁。 原審法官接納涉案可卡因中有15%為申請人自用。申請人有16項犯罪記錄,大部分和毒品有關。 考慮到毒品的份量及申請人的犯罪記錄,原審法官採納的45個月量刑基準並判處申請人30個月的判刑,絕非明顯過重。 未能在規定下出示身分證明文件的罪行的1,000元罰款亦非不合理。 申請人針對判刑提出的上訴許可申請,沒有可爭拗的論點,亦沒有成功機會,因此本席不批准申請人就判刑上訴。 (楊振權) 高等法院署理首席法官 答辯人: 由律政司高級檢控官蕭啟業代表。 申請人: 沒有律師代表,親自應訊。