香港特別行政區 訴 陳志文
Applicant failed to demonstrate an arguable appeal and the conviction rested on factual findings; the four-year sentence was in line with precedent; personal compassionate grounds did not justify bail — therefore bail pending appeal was refused.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 陳志文
- Parties
- Respondent: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; Applicant: 陳志文 (CHAN CHI MAN)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 August 2012
- Case Number
- CACC237/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence / Bail Pending Appeal Application
- Outcome
- Bail pending appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Conviction on Facts, Standard of Appellate Review, Compassionate Grounds
- Source Language
- ch
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Respondent
陳志文 (CHAN CHI MAN)
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence / Bail Pending Appeal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether bail pending appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether applicant has an arguable appeal
- 3 Whether applicant has served the whole or the major part of the sentence so as to make bail appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to demonstrate an arguable appeal and the conviction rested on factual findings; the four-year sentence was in line with precedent; personal compassionate grounds did not justify bail — therefore bail pending appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
Bail pending appeal refused.
Orders
- Application for bail pending appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CACC 237/2012 香港特別行政區 高等法院上訴法庭 刑事司法管轄權 判罪及刑期上訴許可申請 案件編號 :刑事上訴案件 2012 年第 237 號 (原區域法院刑事案件 2012 年第 219 號) 答辯人 香港特別行政區 與 申請人 陳志文 (CHAN CHI MAN) 審理法官:高等法院上訴法庭法官張澤祐內庭聆訊 聆訊日期:2012 年 8 月 3 日 判決日期:2012 年 8 月 3 日 判決書 申請人被裁定一項「勒索」罪及一項「聲稱是三合會社團的成員」罪罪名成立及被判監四年。申請人就定罪及刑期提出上訴許可申請。現申請人申請在上訴候審期間保釋。 上訴候審期間保釋申請的法律原則是申請人必須證明他具有充分的上訴理由或者是當上訴聆訊時申請人已經服完整個或大部分的刑期,因為若果他上訴得直的話,這會對他不公平。申請人必須符合這兩項條件才可獲得保釋。 在本案,法官裁定申請人罪名成立是一項關於事實的裁決。申請人在現階段未能證明他具有充分的上訴理由。另外,四年的刑期亦是法官根據案例而作出的。申請人亦未能就此提出充分的上訴理據。他所提出需要照顧患病母親的個人理由亦不能支持其申請。基於上述原因,本席駁回申請。 (張澤祐) 高等法院上訴法庭法官 答辯人:由律政司檢控官傅悅耳代表。 申請人:無律師代表, 親自出席。