DU SHUI WING AND OTHERS v. FU KIN FUNG AND OTHERS
The court found there were serious issues to be tried, the company's affairs were being conducted in a manner causing operational jeopardy and unfair prejudice to members and that the balance of convenience favored interim intervention; accordingly, pending determination of the amended petition the court appointed a receiver/manager to protect company assets and manage operations, subject to the usual undertaking as to damages.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 2924
- Parties
- Petitioners: 1st to 7th Petitioners; Respondent: 1st Respondent; Respondent: 2nd Respondent; Respondent: 3rd Respondent; Respondent: 4th Respondent; 5th Respondent (company): 5th Respondent - Kwai Ching United Green Public Light Bus Company Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2020
- Case Number
- HCMP846/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Company Petition Under Companies Ordinance S724 (unfairly Prejudicial Conduct) / Interim Application for Appointment of Receiver/manager (chambers Hearing; Interlocutory)
- Outcome
- Interim appointment of receiver/manager granted pending final determination of the amended petition
- Legal Topics
- Unfairly Prejudicial Conduct, Appointment of Receiver/manager, Interim Relief Test (american Cyanamid), Validity of General Meetings and Directors' Removal, Access to Company Bank Accounts and Operational Control
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
1st to 7th Petitioners
Petitioners
1st Respondent
Respondent
2nd Respondent
Respondent
3rd Respondent
Respondent
4th Respondent
Respondent
5th Respondent - Kwai Ching United Green Public Light Bus Company Limited
5th Respondent (company)
Procedural Posture
Company Petition Under Companies Ordinance S724 (unfairly Prejudicial Conduct) / Interim Application for Appointment of Receiver/manager (chambers Hearing; Interlocutory)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is a serious issue to be tried on the petition alleging unfairly prejudicial conduct
- 2 Whether there is a proper basis for appointing a receiver/manager (jeopardy to assets and management dysfunction)
- 3 Whether the balance of convenience favors appointment of an interim receiver/manager
Ratio Decidendi
The court found there were serious issues to be tried, the company's affairs were being conducted in a manner causing operational jeopardy and unfair prejudice to members and that the balance of convenience favored interim intervention; accordingly, pending determination of the amended petition the court appointed a receiver/manager to protect company assets and manage operations, subject to the usual undertaking as to damages.
Court Disposition
Interim appointment of receiver/manager granted pending final determination of the amended petition
Orders
- Upon the usual undertaking as to damages given by the petitioners, Mr Alvin Wan Tin Yau of Moores Rowland (HK) CPA Limited is appointed receiver/manager of the 5th respondent pending final determination of the amended petition to manage and conduct the ordinary business of the Company including calculating and...
- The appointed receiver/manager is authorized to charge a flat fee of $48,000 per month and to take steps including engagement of lawyers as necessary to exercise his powers and duties
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment