CHAN FUK TAI AND OTHERS v. CHAN WAI MING
The defendant must file a supplemental verified affidavit exhibiting a full, tabulated account (Scott Schedule style) and verify all sums claimed; permit inspection of all relevant documents within specified short timelines; plaintiffs must file an objection affirmation with a schedule of objections after...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 2810
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff (beneficiary): CHAN FUK TAI; 2nd Plaintiff (beneficiary): CHAN CHOI; 3rd Plaintiff (beneficiary): CHAN LAU CHING; 4th Plaintiff (beneficiary): CHAN SIU HO; 5th Plaintiff (beneficiary): CHAN MING CHUN; Defendant; Administrator of Estate: CHAN WAI MING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 December 2018
- Case Number
- HCMP3474/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons (administration of Estate) / Interlocutory Directions Hearing; Inquiry Ordered
- Outcome
- Court directed an interlocutory inquiry into the verified accounts with specific disclosure and timetable directions; refused to permit expansion of inquiry to alleged conspiracy; made costs order nisi that costs follow outcome of inquiry.
- Legal Topics
- Accounts and Vouching, Letters of Administration, Inspection of Documents, Scott Schedule, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN FUK TAI
1st Plaintiff (beneficiary)
CHAN CHOI
2nd Plaintiff (beneficiary)
CHAN LAU CHING
3rd Plaintiff (beneficiary)
CHAN SIU HO
4th Plaintiff (beneficiary)
CHAN MING CHUN
5th Plaintiff (beneficiary)
CHAN WAI MING
Defendant; Administrator of Estate
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons (administration of Estate) / Interlocutory Directions Hearing; Inquiry Ordered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant is entitled to include specified deductions/expenses in the verified accounts of the estate
- 2 Whether the defendant must exhibit vouchers/documents and permit inspection to enable audit of accounts
- 3 Whether the defendant may raise and investigate an alleged conspiracy within this originating summons/inquiry
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant must file a supplemental verified affidavit exhibiting a full, tabulated account (Scott Schedule style) and verify all sums claimed; permit inspection of all relevant documents within specified short timelines; plaintiffs must file an objection affirmation with a schedule of objections after inspection; the interlocutory direction hearing is adjourned pending completion of those steps. The defendant's proposal to investigate an alleged conspiracy is excluded for lack of evidential basis and because it is outside the scope of the originating summons/inquiry. Costs related to this dispute are ordered to follow the outcome of the inquiry (costs order nisi).
Court Disposition
Court directed an interlocutory inquiry into the verified accounts with specific disclosure and timetable directions; refused to permit expansion of inquiry to alleged conspiracy; made costs order nisi that costs follow outcome of inquiry.
Orders
- Defendant to file and serve within 14 days a supplemental affirmation exhibiting and verifying a full account of the estate in schedule form (Scott Schedule style)
- Defendant to permit inspection within 14 days thereafter of all relevant documents in his possession or power relating to his claims for payment out of the estate
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment