CHAN CHEUNG PO v. KWAN KAY CHEONG AND ANOTHER
The court refused to make interlocutory findings on the medical fitness of the witness and refused to allow expert evidence to be heard before completion of factual evidence; the court exercised its costs discretion and ordered Kwan Ko Siu Wah and Kwan Kay Cheong to pay the costs of Chow Sai Yiu and Chan Cheung Po...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- CHAN CHEUNG PO v. KWAN KAY CHEONG AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff (original Action): Hong Lok School Limited; 2nd Plaintiff (original Action); 2nd Defendant (counterclaim): Kwan Ko Siu Wah; 1st Defendant (original Action): Chow Sai Yiu; 2nd Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (counterclaim); Executor of the Estate of Kwan Bing Sun (deceased): Chan Cheung Po; 1st Defendant (counterclaim): Kwan Kay Cheong
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2003
- Case Number
- HCA19001/1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial Involving Original Action and Counterclaim Concerning Company/shareholder Dispute and Interlocutory Applications / Part‑heard Trial Adjourned; Interlocutory Hearing on Costs and Procedural Applications
- Outcome
- Partly successful for Defendants on costs; interlocutory rulings on medical fitness refused; application to call expert at that stage refused; costs ordered against specified Plaintiffs for specified applications; costs nisi that applications for costs be costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment, Medical Fitness to Testify, Expert Evidence, Costs Orders, Shareholder Dispute, Interlocutory Applications
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hong Lok School Limited
1st Plaintiff (original Action)
Kwan Ko Siu Wah
2nd Plaintiff (original Action); 2nd Defendant (counterclaim)
Chow Sai Yiu
1st Defendant (original Action)
Chan Cheung Po
2nd Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (counterclaim); Executor of the Estate of Kwan Bing Sun (deceased)
Kwan Kay Cheong
1st Defendant (counterclaim)
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial Involving Original Action and Counterclaim Concerning Company/shareholder Dispute and Interlocutory Applications / Part‑heard Trial Adjourned; Interlocutory Hearing on Costs and Procedural Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should make interlocutory findings on the medical fitness of a witness who will not return to give evidence
- 2 Whether to allow expert evidence before completion of factual evidence
- 3 Whether the Plaintiffs should pay the Defendants' costs for specified applications and whether such costs should be payable forthwith or on an indemnity basis
Ratio Decidendi
The court refused to make interlocutory findings on the medical fitness of the witness and refused to allow expert evidence to be heard before completion of factual evidence; the court exercised its costs discretion and ordered Kwan Ko Siu Wah and Kwan Kay Cheong to pay the costs of Chow Sai Yiu and Chan Cheung Po in respect of the Plaintiff's application for admission of new evidence (30 June and 2 July 2003), the Plaintiff's application on 8 July 2003, and the adjournment of 7 July 2003; those costs are payable in any event and the court made a costs order nisi that the applications for costs be costs in the cause, but declined to order immediate payment or indemnity costs and reserved...
Court Disposition
Partly successful for Defendants on costs; interlocutory rulings on medical fitness refused; application to call expert at that stage refused; costs ordered against specified Plaintiffs for specified applications; costs nisi that applications for costs be costs in the cause.
Orders
- Kwan Ko Siu Wah and Kwan Kay Cheong to pay the costs of Chow Sai Yiu and Chan Cheung Po in respect of the Plaintiff's application for admission of new evidence on 30 June and 2 July 2003 (recorded trial time 3 hours)
- Kwan Ko Siu Wah and Kwan Kay Cheong to pay the costs of Chow Sai Yiu and Chan Cheung Po in respect of the Plaintiff's application on 8 July 2003
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment