CHEUNG CHUI KWAN EVENT v. HEBEI INVESTMENT LTD AND ANOTHER
The court found it was not too late for Cheung's claim to be litigated; she was entitled to be joined as a party to the earlier possession proceedings and to a stay of execution of the writ of possession pending determination of her fresh action; Yu Fung's strike‑out application was dismissed because Cheung's claim could not be summarily treated as abusive or hopeless on the materials before the court.
- Citation
- CHEUNG CHUI KWAN EVENT v. HEBEI INVESTMENT LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff in HCMP 1084/2008; 2nd Defendant in HCA 3104/2015: Yu Fung Company Limited; 1st Defendant in HCMP 1084/2008: Olympic City Properties Limited; 2nd Defendant in HCMP 1084/2008: Lai Ming Tak Tommy Alexander; Interested Party in HCMP 1084/2008; Plaintiff in HCA 3104/2015: Cheung Chui Kwan Event; 1st Defendant in HCA 3104/2015: Hebei Investment Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2017
- Case Number
- HCA3104/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Possession Enforcement and Adverse Possession Claim / Interlocutory (applications for Joinder, Stay and Striking Out)
- Outcome
- Application to join Cheung as party granted; stay of execution of the writ of possession granted; Yu Fung's application to strike out and dismiss HCA 3104/2015 dismissed; costs ordered against Yu Fung with limited qualification.
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Joinder and Intervention, Abuse of Process, Stay of Execution, Limitation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yu Fung Company Limited
Plaintiff in HCMP 1084/2008; 2nd Defendant in HCA 3104/2015
Olympic City Properties Limited
1st Defendant in HCMP 1084/2008
Lai Ming Tak Tommy Alexander
2nd Defendant in HCMP 1084/2008
Cheung Chui Kwan Event
Interested Party in HCMP 1084/2008; Plaintiff in HCA 3104/2015
Hebei Investment Limited
1st Defendant in HCA 3104/2015
Procedural Posture
Possession Enforcement and Adverse Possession Claim / Interlocutory (applications for Joinder, Stay and Striking Out)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Cheung’s claim to occupy the flat is time‑barred or an abuse of process given earlier proceedings
- 2 Whether Cheung’s claim meets any threshold of arguability to be litigated
- 3 In which proceedings (existing possession action or fresh action) Cheung’s claim should properly be tried
Ratio Decidendi
The court found it was not too late for Cheung's claim to be litigated; she was entitled to be joined as a party to the earlier possession proceedings and to a stay of execution of the writ of possession pending determination of her fresh action; Yu Fung's strike‑out application was dismissed because Cheung's claim could not be summarily treated as abusive or hopeless on the materials before the court.
Court Disposition
Application to join Cheung as party granted; stay of execution of the writ of possession granted; Yu Fung's application to strike out and dismiss HCA 3104/2015 dismissed; costs ordered against Yu Fung with limited qualification.
Orders
- Cheung to be joined as a party to HCMP 1084/2008.
- Execution of the writ of possession in HCMP 1084/2008 stayed until determination of Cheung's claim in HCA 3104/2015 or further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment