WU KAI WAI AND OTHERS v. Occupants of Lot No.316 in D.D. 128, Yuen Long, New Territories AND ANOTHER
Having considered the parties' conduct and the extent of success, the court varied the order nisi and ordered the 2nd defendant to pay 60% of the costs of the 1st to 6th plaintiffs of the action, with certificate for counsel, to be taxed if not agreed; and ordered the 2nd defendant to pay the costs of and occasioned by the application.
- Citation
- [2022] HKDC 253
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: WU KAI WAI; 2nd Plaintiff: WU KAI HIN; 3rd Plaintiff: WU LIN HOR; 4th Plaintiff: WU LIN SAN; 5th Plaintiff: WU FOO TAI; 6th Plaintiff: WU KWONG SAN, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF WU SIU HING ALSO KNOWN AS WU SHIU HING, DECEASED; 1st Defendant: Occupants of Lot No.316 in D.D. 128, Yuen Long, New Territories; 2nd Defendant: LUI CHUN SHING
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2022
- Case Number
- DCCJ3740/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Adverse Possession Claim / Application to Vary Costs Order Nisi (paper Disposal)
- Outcome
- Order nisi varied and made absolute in part: 2nd defendant ordered to pay a proportion of plaintiffs' costs; application costs to be paid by 2nd defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Costs Order, Variation of Order Nisi, Oral Tenancy, Vacant Possession
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WU KAI WAI
1st Plaintiff
WU KAI HIN
2nd Plaintiff
WU LIN HOR
3rd Plaintiff
WU LIN SAN
4th Plaintiff
WU FOO TAI
5th Plaintiff
WU KWONG SAN, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF WU SIU HING ALSO KNOWN AS WU SHIU HING, DECEASED
6th Plaintiff
Occupants of Lot No.316 in D.D. 128, Yuen Long, New Territories
1st Defendant
LUI CHUN SHING
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Adverse Possession Claim / Application to Vary Costs Order Nisi (paper Disposal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to vary the order nisi on costs
- 2 Allocation of costs between parties in light of success on the substantive claim
- 3 Whether parties' conduct justifies departure from the usual rule that costs follow the event
Ratio Decidendi
Having considered the parties' conduct and the extent of success, the court varied the order nisi and ordered the 2nd defendant to pay 60% of the costs of the 1st to 6th plaintiffs of the action, with certificate for counsel, to be taxed if not agreed; and ordered the 2nd defendant to pay the costs of and occasioned by the application.
Court Disposition
Order nisi varied and made absolute in part: 2nd defendant ordered to pay a proportion of plaintiffs' costs; application costs to be paid by 2nd defendant.
Orders
- 2nd defendant to pay 60% of the costs of the 1st to 6th plaintiffs of the action, with certificate for counsel, to be taxed if not agreed.
- Costs of and occasioned by this application to be paid by the 2nd defendant to the 1st to 6th plaintiffs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment