YIU FAN AND ANOTHER v. THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF LEE UN, DECEASED AND ANOTHER
On the pleaded facts the plaintiffs established factual possession, animus possidendi and the requisite 12 years' possession such that they acquired possessory title (held as joint tenants); although the Government's resumption extinguished the paper title, the court will grant the declaratory relief sought in default judgment under Order 19 r 7 to enable the plaintiffs to claim compensation under the LRO; no costs order was made against the defendants.
- Citation
- [2025] HKDC 1933
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Yiu Fan (饒勛); 2nd Plaintiff: Li Wang (李竑); 1st Defendant: The Personal Representative of Lee Un (李奀), Deceased; 2nd Defendant: The Personal Representative of Chui Kam Chiu (徐錦趙), Deceased
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2025
- Case Number
- DCCJ4293/2024
- Procedural Posture
- Adverse Possession Claim / Default Judgment Application Under Order 19 Rule 7 of the Rules of the District Court
- Outcome
- Declarations granted: (1) that the defendants' title to the 4th floor including roof at No 34A Tak Ku Ling Road had been extinguished by operation of ss 7 and 17 of the Limitation Ordinance prior to resumption; and (2) that the plaintiffs had been in joint adverse possession for more than 12 years and acquired...
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Limitation Ordinance, Lands Resumption Ordinance, Declaratory Relief, Default Judgment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yiu Fan (饒勛)
1st Plaintiff
Li Wang (李竑)
2nd Plaintiff
The Personal Representative of Lee Un (李奀), Deceased
1st Defendant
The Personal Representative of Chui Kam Chiu (徐錦趙), Deceased
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Adverse Possession Claim / Default Judgment Application Under Order 19 Rule 7 of the Rules of the District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiffs established adverse possession for the requisite 12 years
- 2 Whether possessory title held by multiple squatters is held as joint tenancy
- 3 Whether court should grant declaratory relief after government resumption to enable compensation claims
Ratio Decidendi
On the pleaded facts the plaintiffs established factual possession, animus possidendi and the requisite 12 years' possession such that they acquired possessory title (held as joint tenants); although the Government's resumption extinguished the paper title, the court will grant the declaratory relief sought in default judgment under Order 19 r 7 to enable the plaintiffs to claim compensation under the LRO; no costs order was made against the defendants.
Court Disposition
Declarations granted: (1) that the defendants' title to the 4th floor including roof at No 34A Tak Ku Ling Road had been extinguished by operation of ss 7 and 17 of the Limitation Ordinance prior to resumption; and (2) that the plaintiffs had been in joint adverse possession for more than 12 years and acquired...
Orders
- Declaration that the defendants' title to the Property had been extinguished by virtue of Sections 7 and 17 of the Limitation Ordinance prior to resumption
- Declaration that the plaintiffs had been in joint adverse possession of the Property for a period exceeding 12 years and acquired a possessory title as joint tenants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment