RE YIP KIT WAH
Amendments correcting dates in bankruptcy petitions are permissible where the correct date of expiry can be calculated from the petition (defect is formal); where the petition as drafted does not permit calculation (for example where service was by post and the petition fails to state the deemed date), the petition is defective and, if the three-month period has expired, must be dismissed. Amendments are allowed where made within the three-month period to cure defects that enable calculation of the expiry date.
- Citation
- RE YIP KIT WAH
- Parties
- Petitioner/creditor: The China and South Sea Bank Limited; Debtor: Yam Sze Pui; Debtor: Yan Chung Kai trading as Kai Kee Piecegoods; Debtor: Ng Yin Man (Farwina); Debtor: Yip Kit Wah; Petitioner/creditor: Caltex Oil Hong Kong Limited; Debtor: Wong Min Fook trading as Yau Lee; Petitioner/creditor: Lee Ho Kee trading as Hang Lee Company; Debtor: Chik Yip Fai; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 1 November 1985
- Case Number
- HCB416/1985
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Applications for Amendment of Bankruptcy Petitions (interlocutory)
- Outcome
- Mixed: leave to amend granted in B413 (and similarly in B414, B415, B416) and in B634; petition B448 dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Petitions, Service by Post, Bankruptcy Notice, Act of Bankruptcy, Computation of Time, Order 10 Rule 3
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The China and South Sea Bank Limited
Petitioner/creditor
Yam Sze Pui
Debtor
Yan Chung Kai trading as Kai Kee Piecegoods
Debtor
Ng Yin Man (Farwina)
Debtor
Yip Kit Wah
Debtor
Caltex Oil Hong Kong Limited
Petitioner/creditor
Wong Min Fook trading as Yau Lee
Debtor
Lee Ho Kee trading as Hang Lee Company
Petitioner/creditor
Chik Yip Fai
Debtor
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Applications for Amendment of Bankruptcy Petitions (interlocutory)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an amendment correcting the date of expiry of a bankruptcy notice is permissible when made after the three-month act of bankruptcy period
- 2 Whether a defective notice that still permits calculation of the expiry date is a matter of form (amendable) or substance (fatal)
- 3 Effect of service by post and the deemed date of service under Order 10 rule 3 and its impact on when the notice period runs
Ratio Decidendi
Amendments correcting dates in bankruptcy petitions are permissible where the correct date of expiry can be calculated from the petition (defect is formal); where the petition as drafted does not permit calculation (for example where service was by post and the petition fails to state the deemed date), the petition is defective and, if the three-month period has expired, must be dismissed. Amendments are allowed where made within the three-month period to cure defects that enable calculation of the expiry date.
Court Disposition
Mixed: leave to amend granted in B413 (and similarly in B414, B415, B416) and in B634; petition B448 dismissed.
Orders
- Leave granted to amend petition B413 to correct expiry date (delete 'July' substitute 'June'); no receiving order made and hearing adjourned
- Similar leave granted in B414, B415 and B416 to correct calculable date errors
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment