LOH SAI, THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WANG GEORGE ALSO KNOWN AS GEORGE WANG, DECEASED v. HIGH CHOICE ENTERPRISES LTD AND ANOTHER
The Registrar exercised discretion: costs of the amendment application (including reserved costs and consequential amendments) are to be paid to Loh Sai and High Choice and taxed if not agreed; costs of the discovery application (including inspection) are to be costs in the cause because discovery was part of case management and High Choice had a duty to disclose pursuant to Order 24; Loh is awarded specified costs for preparation before Master Au‑Yeung; assessed hearing costs are allocated as quantified and payable within 21 days; counsel certificates for this hearing disallowed.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 98
- Parties
- Plaintiff (original Action); 2nd Defendant (by Counterclaim): Loh Sai (Administratrix of the Estate of Wang George); 1st Defendant (original Action and by Counterclaim): High Choice Enterprises Limited; 2nd Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (by Counterclaim): Chan Lai Lai
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2018
- Case Number
- HCMP1775/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Charging Order / Interlocutory Applications for Amendment and Discovery / Hearing and Decision on Costs Following Interlocutory Directions (registrar's Costs Decision)
- Outcome
- Costs allocated as ordered: amendment costs to respondents; discovery costs in the cause; specified monetary awards to respondents; counsel certificates disallowed
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Specific Discovery, Costs Orders, Charging Order, Proprietary Estoppel, Common Intention Constructive Trust
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Loh Sai (Administratrix of the Estate of Wang George)
Plaintiff (original Action); 2nd Defendant (by Counterclaim)
High Choice Enterprises Limited
1st Defendant (original Action and by Counterclaim)
Chan Lai Lai
2nd Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (by Counterclaim)
Procedural Posture
Charging Order / Interlocutory Applications for Amendment and Discovery / Hearing and Decision on Costs Following Interlocutory Directions (registrar's Costs Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant for amendment should pay costs or have costs in the cause
- 2 Whether costs of discovery application should be ordered against applicant or be costs in the cause
- 3 Whether respondents are entitled to specific costs for preparation before Master Au‑Yeung and for the costs hearing
Ratio Decidendi
The Registrar exercised discretion: costs of the amendment application (including reserved costs and consequential amendments) are to be paid to Loh Sai and High Choice and taxed if not agreed; costs of the discovery application (including inspection) are to be costs in the cause because discovery was part of case management and High Choice had a duty to disclose pursuant to Order 24; Loh is awarded specified costs for preparation before Master Au‑Yeung; assessed hearing costs are allocated as quantified and payable within 21 days; counsel certificates for this hearing disallowed.
Court Disposition
Costs allocated as ordered: amendment costs to respondents; discovery costs in the cause; specified monetary awards to respondents; counsel certificates disallowed
Orders
- The costs of and occasioned by Chan Lai Lai’s application for amendment of her pleadings be to Loh Sai and High Choice, to be taxed if not agreed in any event
- The costs of Chan Lai Lai’s application for discovery, including the costs for inspection of the documents, be costs in the cause, to be taxed if not agreed in any event; Loh Sai to be paid costs for preparation before Master Au‑Yeung as set out below
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment