CHOY PO CHUN AND ANOTHER v. AU WING LUN
The court found appointment of an administrator pendent lite expedient due to substantial estate, active rent litigation and non-cooperation between rival executors; on balance Hang Seng (Trustee) Limited was preferred because it is a specialist trust corporation with reputation, likely better able to provide security and obtain a grant speedily, and the defendant's allegations about its neutrality were unfounded and irrelevant to its fitness; appointment was made conditional on filing specified corporate/consent documents and further submissions on the scope of powers.
- Citation
- CHOY PO CHUN AND ANOTHER v. AU WING LUN
- Parties
- Plaintiffs / Applicants: Plaintiffs (two executors under 2002 will); Defendant / Executor Under 2008 Will: Au Wing Lun (aka Au Wing Lun William)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 6 May 2010
- Case Number
- HCAP7/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration / Application for Appointment of Administrator Pendent Lite (directions Hearing Pending)
- Outcome
- Hang Seng (Trustee) Limited to be appointed administrator pendent lite subject to filing of required documents and further submissions on scope of powers
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Administrator Pendent Lite, Fiduciary Duties of Administrators, Conflict of Interest Neutrality, Security for Grant, Scope of Interim Powers, Practice Borrowing From English Probate Registry
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiffs (two executors under 2002 will)
Plaintiffs / Applicants
Au Wing Lun (aka Au Wing Lun William)
Defendant / Executor Under 2008 Will
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Application for Appointment of Administrator Pendent Lite (directions Hearing Pending)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an administrator pendent lite should be appointed
- 2 Which candidate is the proper administrator pendent lite
- 3 Whether Hang Seng (Trustee) Limited has a disqualifying conflict of interest or lacks neutrality
Ratio Decidendi
The court found appointment of an administrator pendent lite expedient due to substantial estate, active rent litigation and non-cooperation between rival executors; on balance Hang Seng (Trustee) Limited was preferred because it is a specialist trust corporation with reputation, likely better able to provide security and obtain a grant speedily, and the defendant's allegations about its neutrality were unfounded and irrelevant to its fitness; appointment was made conditional on filing specified corporate/consent documents and further submissions on the scope of powers.
Court Disposition
Hang Seng (Trustee) Limited to be appointed administrator pendent lite subject to filing of required documents and further submissions on scope of powers
Orders
- Plaintiffs to file and serve within 7 days a confirmation whether Hang Seng (Trustee) Limited is a trust corporation and, if so, furnish a certificate under S.78 Trustee Ordinance (Cap.29)
- Plaintiffs to file and serve the consent of Hang Seng (Trustee) Limited to act within 7 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment