THE PUI YING MIDDLE SCHOOL OF HONG KONG AND OTHERS v. SO SHING YIT ERIC AND OTHERS
The court exercised its discretion and concluded that the 2nd Action was the central matter at trial and that apportionment should not be determined arithmetically by listing estimates; accordingly the defendants' costs in the two actions were apportioned 1/6 to HCA 1991/2016 and 5/6 to HCA 3314/2016, and the costs...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 1288
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: THE PUI YING MIDDLE SCHOOL OF HONG KONG; 2nd Plaintiff: LEE WAI TING WILLIAM; 3rd Plaintiff (discontinued): LI CHI KIN DANIEL; 4th Plaintiff: LEUNG CHUEK MAN; 1st Defendant: SO SHING YIT ERIC; 2nd Defendant: BETTSY NG; 3rd Defendant: YUNG CHUEN HUNG; 4th Defendant: MA CHI MAN JICK; 5th Defendant (discontinued): FUNG SAU CHUNG; 6th Defendant: LI KAM CHEONG; 7th Defendant: CHAN YEE YEE; Defendant (hca 3314/2016): THE HONG KONG COUNCIL OF THE CHURCH OF CHRIST IN CHINA
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2023
- Case Number
- HCA1991/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Costs Apportionment Between Two Actions Heard Together / Application for Apportionment of Costs After Trial / Judgment on Liability and Costs
- Outcome
- Apportionment directed: defendants' costs in the two actions apportioned 1/6 for HCA 1991/2016 and 5/6 for HCA 3314/2016; costs of the apportionment application to be paid by the defendants to the plaintiff on a nisi basis.
- Legal Topics
- Apportionment of Costs, Nisi Order, Consolidation/connected Actions and Allocation of Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE PUI YING MIDDLE SCHOOL OF HONG KONG
1st Plaintiff
LEE WAI TING WILLIAM
2nd Plaintiff
LI CHI KIN DANIEL
3rd Plaintiff (discontinued)
LEUNG CHUEK MAN
4th Plaintiff
SO SHING YIT ERIC
1st Defendant
BETTSY NG
2nd Defendant
YUNG CHUEN HUNG
3rd Defendant
MA CHI MAN JICK
4th Defendant
FUNG SAU CHUNG
5th Defendant (discontinued)
LI KAM CHEONG
6th Defendant
CHAN YEE YEE
7th Defendant
THE HONG KONG COUNCIL OF THE CHURCH OF CHRIST IN CHINA
Defendant (hca 3314/2016)
Procedural Posture
Civil Costs Apportionment Between Two Actions Heard Together / Application for Apportionment of Costs After Trial / Judgment on Liability and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether and how to apportion the defendants' costs between HCA 1991/2016 and HCA 3314/2016
- 2 Whether Listing Questionnaire time estimates should determine apportionment
- 3 Whether equal apportionment is appropriate where issues are intertwined but one action was central at trial
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion and concluded that the 2nd Action was the central matter at trial and that apportionment should not be determined arithmetically by listing estimates; accordingly the defendants' costs in the two actions were apportioned 1/6 to HCA 1991/2016 and 5/6 to HCA 3314/2016, and the costs of the apportionment application were ordered to be paid by the defendants to the plaintiff on a nisi basis.
Court Disposition
Apportionment directed: defendants' costs in the two actions apportioned 1/6 for HCA 1991/2016 and 5/6 for HCA 3314/2016; costs of the apportionment application to be paid by the defendants to the plaintiff on a nisi basis.
Orders
- The defendants' costs in the Two Actions are apportioned as to 1/6 for HCA 1991/2016 and 5/6 for HCA 3314/2016 respectively
- The costs of this application for apportionment shall be paid by the defendants to the plaintiff on a nisi basis
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment